Legal Case Summary

James DeFazio v. Hollister Inc.


Date Argued: Wed Mar 11 2015
Case Number: W2013-02765-CCA-R3-CD
Docket Number: 2640912
Judges:McKeown, Murguia, Friedland
Duration: 44 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: James DeFazio v. Hollister Inc.** **Docket Number:** 2640912 **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date:** [Insert Decision Date] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** James DeFazio - **Defendant:** Hollister Inc. **Background:** James DeFazio initiated a lawsuit against Hollister Inc. over a dispute related to [specific issue e.g. product liability, employment practices, contractual disagreements – insert specifics based on case facts]. The plaintiff alleged that [briefly summarize the plaintiff's allegations, e.g., "the product caused injury due to manufacturing defects" or "the company failed to adhere to employment regulations"]. **Legal Issues:** The central legal questions in this case included: 1. [First legal issue, e.g., whether Hollister Inc. can be held liable for the claims made by the plaintiff.] 2. [Second legal issue, e.g., whether proper procedures were followed in the manufacturing process or employment practices.] 3. [Any other relevant legal considerations the court had to address.] **Court Proceedings:** The case was brought before [insert court or jurisdiction] where oral arguments were presented on [insert dates or timeframe]. Relevant evidence was submitted, amid testimonies from both parties and expert witnesses. **Decision:** After reviewing the arguments and evidence, the court issued its decision on [insert decision date]. The court ruled in favor of [either Plaintiff or Defendant], determining that [briefly summarize the court's findings, e.g., "the defendant was liable for damages" or "the claims made by the plaintiff were unsubstantiated"]. **Outcome:** As a result of the court's ruling, [insert outcome, e.g., "Hollister Inc. was ordered to pay damages to James DeFazio" or "the case was dismissed, and no damages were awarded"]. The decision could have implications for [consider potential broader impacts, e.g., "future lawsuits against manufacturers" or "company policy changes"]. **Conclusion:** This case highlights significant legal principles related to [insert relevant legal principles, e.g., product liability, employment law, etc.]. The court's ruling serves to reinforce [insert implications or lessons learned from the case]. **Key Takeaways:** 1. [Takeaway 1] 2. [Takeaway 2] 3. [Takeaway 3] **Note:** Please insert relevant facts, legal issues, and specific outcomes based on the actual case details as necessary, as this is a generalized template.

James DeFazio v. Hollister Inc.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available