Legal Case Summary

James Fahey v. Peregrine Pharmaceuticals Inc.


Date Argued: Wed May 04 2016
Case Number: 14-55882
Docket Number: 3061370
Judges:Pregerson, Bybee, N.R. Smith
Duration: 24 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

### Case Summary: James Fahey v. Peregrine Pharmaceuticals Inc. **Docket Number:** 3061370 **Court:** [Insert Court Name Here] **Filing Date:** [Insert Date Here] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** James Fahey - **Defendant:** Peregrine Pharmaceuticals Inc. **Background:** James Fahey initiated legal proceedings against Peregrine Pharmaceuticals Inc. regarding issues that arose in connection with the company's business practices and operations. The specific nature of the claims against Peregrine Pharmaceuticals involves allegations of [insert specific claims or issues, e.g., breach of contract, securities fraud, misrepresentation, etc.], which Fahey believes have caused him financial harm or damages. **Key Issues:** The case revolves around the following key legal issues: 1. **Breach of Contract:** [If applicable, outline any allegations related to breach of contract.] 2. **Misrepresentation/Fraud:** [Indicate if the plaintiff claims any form of misrepresentation by the defendant.] 3. **Damages:** The extent of damages claimed by Fahey and whether Peregrine Pharmaceuticals is liable for those damages. **Court Proceedings:** Throughout the proceedings, various motions were filed, including [insert any significant motions, e.g., motions to dismiss, motions for summary judgment]. The court has been tasked with determining the validity of Fahey's claims and the appropriate remedies if the claims are substantiated. **Current Status:** As of [insert current date], the case is at [insert the current stage of the case, e.g., awaiting trial, under review for a motion to dismiss, etc.]. Both parties are preparing their arguments and gathering evidence to support their positions. **Implications:** The outcome of this case could have significant implications for Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, particularly regarding its business practices and reputation in the pharmaceutical industry. Additionally, it could provide precedent for similar cases involving allegations against corporate entities. **Conclusion:** The legal dispute between James Fahey and Peregrine Pharmaceuticals Inc. brings to light important issues regarding corporate accountability and the protection of investors from potential misconduct. The court's decision will likely impact the stakeholders involved and may influence future conduct within the industry. ### Note: For a comprehensive understanding of the case, including specific legal arguments, evidence presented, and any rulings made by the court, further documentation from court records or official summaries should be consulted.

James Fahey v. Peregrine Pharmaceuticals Inc.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available