Legal Case Summary

James Holland Jr v. Steven Rivard


Date Argued: Wed Apr 29 2015
Case Number: 2013-00837
Docket Number: 2653382
Judges:Not available
Duration: 43 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: James Holland Jr. v. Steven Rivard, Docket Number 2653382** **Court:** [Specify the Court, e.g., Superior Court of [State]] **Date:** [Specify the Date of the Decision] **Background:** James Holland Jr. filed a lawsuit against Steven Rivard, resulting in case number 2653382. The dispute arose from [insert key facts about the nature of the case, such as a contractual disagreement, tort claim, property dispute, etc.]. Holland alleged that Rivard engaged in [specific actions or inactions that led to the lawsuit]. **Key Issues:** 1. The primary legal questions pertained to [insert the main legal issues being contested, such as breach of contract, negligence, or other relevant claims]. 2. [Mention any specific statutes, regulations, or common law principles that were relevant to the case]. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Arguments (Holland):** Holland contended that [summarize the plaintiff's claims, including any evidence or testimony presented, as well as the relief sought from the court]. - **Defendant's Arguments (Rivard):** Rivard, on the other hand, argued that [summarize the defendant's defenses or counterclaims, including any supporting evidence or legal rationale]. **Ruling:** The court ultimately ruled in favor of [Holland/Rivard], citing [briefly summarize the rationale behind the court's decision, including any legal precedents cited or evidence deemed compelling]. The ruling indicated that [insert details on the nature of the judgment, such as damages awarded, injunction ordered, etc.]. **Conclusion:** The case of James Holland Jr. v. Steven Rivard serves as a precedent for [any implications of the case for future cases, legal interpretations, or business practices]. The court's decision reflected [any broader legal principles that were applied, public policy considerations, etc.]. **Next Steps:** Following the ruling, [specify any potential actions that might occur, such as an appeal, compliance with the judgment, or other legal implications for both parties]. **Notes:** For further details on evidentiary submissions, witness testimonies, or other case-specific nuances, refer to the official court documents or legal databases. --- Please fill in the placeholders with specific details regarding the court, date of decision, and case specifics as relevant to the actual case for accuracy.

James Holland Jr v. Steven Rivard


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available