Case Summary
**Case Summary: James Horton v. Frank Pobjecky**
**Docket Number:** 6184235
**Court:** [Specify the court if known, e.g., Superior Court, Circuit Court, etc.]
**Date:** [Insert the date when the case was filed and/or decided]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** James Horton
- **Defendant:** Frank Pobjecky
**Background:**
James Horton filed a lawsuit against Frank Pobjecky, seeking [insert the general nature of the claim, e.g., damages for breach of contract, negligence, etc.]. The dispute arose from [briefly describe the facts leading to the lawsuit, e.g., an incident that occurred, contractual obligations, etc.].
**Claims:**
The plaintiff asserted that [detail the specific claims made by Horton against Pobjecky, including the legal basis for those claims. If multiple claims were made, briefly list them].
**Defendant's Position:**
Frank Pobjecky responded to the claims by [summarize the defendant's arguments or defenses. This may include denial of allegations, affirmative defenses, or counterclaims, if applicable].
**Proceedings:**
The case involved several key motions, including [describe any significant motions filed by either party, such as motions to dismiss, motions for summary judgment, etc.]. [If there were hearings, deposition, or trial details relevant to the outcome, include those here.]
**Outcome:**
The court [explain the outcome of the case, such as ruling in favor of the plaintiff or defendant, any awards for damages, injunctions issued, etc.]. The judgment was based on [provide a brief rationale for the court’s decision, referencing applicable laws or precedents if known].
**Conclusion:**
The case of James Horton v. Frank Pobjecky highlights [summarize the significance of the case, any implications for future cases, or legal principles established]. The decision may set a precedent for [list any relevant areas of law impacted by the ruling, if applicable].
**Court's Opinion:** [If there is an official opinion or notable quotes from the judge, include a brief excerpt that elucidates the legal reasoning or key points].
(Note: This is a hypothetical structure; specific details and factual accuracy concerning the case should be obtained from official court documents or legal databases.)