Legal Case Summary

James Maciel, Sr. v. Matthew Cates


Date Argued: Tue Jul 09 2013
Case Number: 11-56620
Docket Number: 7837523
Judges:Benavides, Bybee, Nguyen
Duration: 17 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: James Maciel, Sr. v. Matthew Cates** **Docket Number:** 7837523 **Court:** [Specify the Court if known, e.g., California Court of Appeal] **Date:** [Specify Hearing Date if known] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff/Appellant:** James Maciel, Sr. - **Defendant/Appellee:** Matthew Cates **Background:** The case involves James Maciel, Sr., who has brought legal action against Matthew Cates. The specific circumstances that led to the lawsuit are centered around [briefly describe the nature of the dispute or claims made by the plaintiff, e.g., negligence, breach of contract, etc. if known]. **Facts:** - The plaintiff, James Maciel, Sr., alleges that [summarize the key facts or the basis of the plaintiff's claims]. - The defendant, Matthew Cates, [summarize the defendant's response to the allegations, including any defenses raised, if known]. **Legal Issues:** The case raises several legal issues, including but not limited to: - [List and briefly describe the major legal questions, such as the application of specific laws, standards of care, or liability.] **Court Proceedings:** The case has gone through [describe any important motions, hearings, or procedural steps that have occurred, such as trial, settlement negotiations, etc.]. The court's ruling details, as well as the reasoning behind the decision, are critical in understanding the outcome. **Ruling:** The court [summarize the court's decision, including any findings or judgments made in favor of either party]. **Conclusion:** The outcome of **James Maciel, Sr. v. Matthew Cates** has implications for [mention any broader impacts or significance of the case, if relevant]. This case highlights important considerations regarding [mention relevant legal principles or issues identified throughout the litigation]. **Next Steps:** Following the ruling, further actions may be [discuss any options for appeal, enforcement of judgment, or future hearings, if applicable]. (Note: If additional factual details or legal context were provided, they would be integrated into the respective sections of the summary.)

James Maciel, Sr. v. Matthew Cates


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available