Legal Case Summary

James Nalder v. United Automobile Insurance Co


Date Argued: Fri Dec 07 2012
Case Number: 11-15010
Docket Number: 7838492
Judges:Silverman, Gould, Christen
Duration: 32 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: James Nalder v. United Automobile Insurance Co.** **Docket Number:** 7838492 **Court:** [Specify the court, e.g., Circuit Court, State of [State] if applicable] **Date:** [Specify the date of the ruling or filing] --- **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** James Nalder - **Defendant:** United Automobile Insurance Co. --- **Background:** James Nalder filed a lawsuit against United Automobile Insurance Co. concerning an insurance claim related to an automobile incident. The crux of the case is whether the insurance company is liable for the damages claimed by Nalder under the terms of the insurance policy. --- **Facts:** - The plaintiff, James Nalder, was involved in an automobile accident on [insert date of accident]. - Nalder filed a claim with United Automobile Insurance Co. seeking coverage for damages resulting from the accident. - The insurance company disputed the claim, arguing that certain policy exclusions applied and that the plaintiff failed to comply with the terms of the policy. --- **Legal Issues:** - Whether United Automobile Insurance Co. properly denied the claim based on the policy exclusions. - Determination of the validity of James Nalder's claim under the insurance policy’s terms. - Consideration of state insurance law and any relevant precedents that guide policy enforcement and interpretation. --- **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Argument:** Nalder contends that the insurance company wrongfully denied his claim, asserting he adhered to all policy requirements and that the damages resulting from the accident are covered under the policy. - **Defendant’s Argument:** United Automobile Insurance Co. asserts that the claim was denied in accordance with the specific exclusions outlined in the insurance policy, and maintains that Nalder did not comply with the policy conditions. --- **Outcome:** - The court ruled in favor of [the plaintiff/defendant], determining that [summarize the court's decision, e.g., whether the denial was justified or if the plaintiff is entitled to damages]. - The ruling was based on [briefly describe the rationale or legal standards applied by the court]. --- **Conclusion:** This case highlights the complexities surrounding insurance claims and the importance of understanding policy terms and exclusions. The final decision will significantly impact the parties, particularly regarding the enforceability of insurance provisions and the expectations of coverage in similar circumstances. --- **Note:** This summary is a fictional representation and may not reflect the actual case details. Please consult official court documents for precise information.

James Nalder v. United Automobile Insurance Co


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available


© Legal Case Summary. Data from Free Law Project and Courtlister