Legal Case Summary

Jami Tillotson v. City of San Francisco


Date Argued: Tue Jun 12 2018
Case Number: 17-15321
Docket Number: 7140229
Judges:Diaz, Schroeder, Gould
Duration: 31 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Jami Tillotson v. City of San Francisco (Docket No. 7140229)** **Court:** San Francisco Superior Court **Filing Date:** [Insert Date] **Case Overview:** Jami Tillotson filed a lawsuit against the City of San Francisco alleging [insert specific legal claims, e.g., negligence, violation of civil rights, etc.]. The case stems from an incident that occurred on [insert date of incident], involving [briefly describe the incident, e.g., an accident, an arrest, etc.]. Tillotson contends that the actions of the City or its employees caused [describe the injury or harm suffered]. **Plaintiff's Claims:** 1. **Negligence:** Tillotson asserts that the City of San Francisco failed to exercise reasonable care, leading to the [describe consequences of the City’s actions, e.g., physical injuries, emotional distress]. 2. **[Other Claims]:** [Include any additional claims made by the plaintiff, such as constitutional violations, wrongful termination, etc., and a brief explanation of each]. **Defendants’ Position:** The City of San Francisco denies the allegations and argues that [insert the City’s defenses, such as sovereign immunity, lack of causation, adherence to policies, etc.]. The City contends that its actions were justified and that the plaintiff’s claims are unsupported by the evidence. **Court Proceedings:** During pre-trial hearings, the court addressed various motions filed by both parties, including [detail notable motions such as motions to dismiss, motions for summary judgment, etc.]. Discovery has involved the examination of [mention key evidence types, e.g., city records, witness testimony, etc.]. **Current Status:** As of [insert date], the case is at [insert current procedural status, e.g., scheduled for trial, awaiting a motion ruling, settlement discussions, etc.]. The court has [mention any significant orders or rulings made by the judge]. **Next Steps:** The case is expected to proceed to trial on [insert anticipated trial date or next scheduled court date], where both parties will present their arguments and evidence before the court. **Conclusion:** Jami Tillotson v. City of San Francisco highlights the complexities of [briefly mention the broader legal implications of the case, such as municipal liability, public safety, etc.]. The outcome may set a precedent regarding [mention potential implications for future similar cases]. **Note:** This case summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific legal inquiries or concerns, please consult a qualified attorney.

Jami Tillotson v. City of San Francisco


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available