Case Summary
**Case Summary: Jani-King Franchising, Inc. v. Jani-King (GB), Lim**
**Docket Number:** 7818050
**Court:** [Insert appropriate court name]
**Date:** [Insert date of decision if known]
**Parties:**
- **Plaintiff:** Jani-King Franchising, Inc.
- **Defendant:** Jani-King (GB), Lim
**Background:**
Jani-King Franchising, Inc., a prominent franchisor in the commercial cleaning industry, filed a suit against Jani-King (GB), Lim, claiming various breaches of contract and infringement of franchise agreements. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant failed to uphold the terms of the franchise agreement, which included obligations related to branding, operational standards, and payment of franchise fees.
**Legal Issues:**
The primary legal issues in this case revolved around:
1. **Breach of Contract:** Whether Jani-King (GB), Lim violated specific provisions of the franchise agreement.
2. **Trademark Infringement:** Whether the defendant's actions constituted unauthorized use of the Jani-King trademark.
3. **Damages:** The extent of damages incurred by Jani-King Franchising, Inc. due to the alleged breaches.
**Holding:**
The court found in favor of Jani-King Franchising, Inc., asserting that Jani-King (GB), Lim did indeed breach the contract and infringe upon the franchise agreement's terms. The ruling emphasized the importance of adhering to franchise agreements and protecting the franchisor's brand identity.
**Outcome:**
The court awarded damages to Jani-King Franchising, Inc. for lost profits and other related expenses incurred as a result of the defendant's non-compliance with the franchise agreement. The decision reinforced the obligations of franchisees to maintain the standards and practices as set forth by the franchisor.
**Significance:**
This case underscores the importance of franchise compliance and the legal remedies available to franchisors when franchisees fail to meet their contractual obligations. It serves as a cautionary tale for franchisees regarding the potential consequences of their actions and the legal protections in place for franchisors.
**Note:** Specific details regarding the court's reasoning, amounts awarded, and any dissenting opinions were not included as they may not be readily available in the public domain. Further research into court records may provide additional insights.