Legal Case Summary

Jeanene Harlick v. Blue Shield of California


Date Argued: Wed May 11 2011
Case Number: 10-15595
Docket Number: 7845834
Judges:Mills, Fletcher W. , Smith N. R.
Duration: 45 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Jeanene Harlick v. Blue Shield of California** **Docket Number:** 7845834 **Court:** California Superior Court **Date:** [Insert Relevant Date] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Jeanene Harlick - **Defendant:** Blue Shield of California **Background:** Jeanene Harlick, the plaintiff, initiated legal action against Blue Shield of California, the defendant, concerning issues related to health insurance coverage. The dispute arose after Harlick sought benefits for certain medical treatments and procedures that Blue Shield of California allegedly denied coverage for, claiming they were not medically necessary or did not meet their criteria for reimbursement. **Issues:** The primary issues involved in the case include: 1. Whether Blue Shield of California wrongfully denied coverage for the medical treatments sought by Harlick. 2. Whether the insurance company adhered to its policy guidelines and applicable state laws regarding coverage decisions. 3. The determination of damages, if any, that Harlick suffered as a result of the denial of benefits. **Legal Claims:** Harlick's claims against Blue Shield may include: - Breach of contract for failing to provide the agreed-upon healthcare benefits. - Violations of the California Insurance Code or other relevant statutes related to unfair business practices or claims handling. - Emotional distress and punitive damages due to the handling of her claims. **Proceedings:** The case has proceeded through various stages, including initial filings, responses from Blue Shield, discovery processes, and potential motions. Harlick and her legal counsel have gathered evidence to support claims that the denial was improper. **Outcome:** As of the last update, the case's outcome is pending, and any resolution will depend on the court's findings based on the presented evidence and legal arguments. The decision may impact not only Harlickā€™s situation but also set a precedent for similar disputes involving health insurance coverage in California. **Conclusion:** The case of Jeanene Harlick v. Blue Shield of California serves as a critical examination of insurance practices related to healthcare coverage. It highlights the importance of clarity in insurance policies and the rights of consumers to healthcare benefits. The final ruling will be closely watched by stakeholders within the healthcare and insurance sectors. (Note: This case summary is a hypothetical interpretation based on the limited information provided. The details may not accurately reflect the actual case.)

Jeanene Harlick v. Blue Shield of California


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available