Legal Case Summary

Jeffrey Herson v. City of Richmond


Date Argued: Wed Oct 08 2014
Case Number: D063363
Docket Number: 2592423
Judges:Ikuta, Smith, Murguia
Duration: 29 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Jeffrey Herson v. City of Richmond** **Docket Number:** 2592423 **Court:** [Insert Court Information] **Date of Ruling:** [Insert Date] **Overview:** Jeffrey Herson filed a lawsuit against the City of Richmond, challenging certain actions taken by the city that he claimed adversely affected his rights. The details of the case involve [specific allegations or issues at hand, e.g., unlawful termination, violation of civil rights, etc.]. **Facts of the Case:** - Jeffrey Herson was [provide background, e.g., employed by the city, a resident affected by city policies, etc.]. - [Outline the events leading up to the lawsuit, including any relevant dates, actions taken by the City of Richmond, and Herson's responses.] - Herson alleged that [summarize key claims or grievances, specifying any relevant laws or regulations that were allegedly violated]. **Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case include: 1. [Issue 1: State the first legal issue, e.g., Did the City of Richmond violate Herson’s rights under a specific law?] 2. [Issue 2: Additional issues can be listed similarly, focusing on the central legal questions that the court will address.] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Arguments (Herson):** - Herson argued that [summarize his main arguments, focusing on harm suffered, legal standards, and supporting evidence]. - [Include any specific laws cited, testimonies, or documents presented in support of his case]. - **Defendant's Arguments (City of Richmond):** - The City of Richmond contended that [summarize the city’s defense, including any justifications for their actions]. - [Mention any counterarguments, evidence, or legal precedents cited by the city's legal team]. **Court’s Ruling:** The court ultimately ruled in favor of [either Herson or the City of Richmond], concluding that: - [Summarize the court's decision, including key findings of fact and conclusions of law]. - [Mention any orders made by the court, such as awards for damages, injunctions, or other forms of relief]. **Conclusion:** This case highlights [discuss the significance of the ruling, including any implications for future cases, legal principles established, or impacts on the parties involved]. The outcome reinforces [state any broader legal standards or community implications, if applicable]. **Next Steps:** - [Indicate any plans for appeal by either party, further proceedings, or settlement discussions if relevant]. *Note: Ensure to verify all factual details and the court's rulings, as they may change over time or may not be publicly available.*

Jeffrey Herson v. City of Richmond


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available