Legal Case Summary

Jeffrey Lannes v. Flowserve U.S.


Date Argued: Mon Aug 31 2015
Case Number: E2014-02431-CCA-R3-PC
Docket Number: 2689440
Judges:Kozinski, O'scannlain, Bybee
Duration: 31 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Jeffrey Lannes v. Flowserve U.S.** **Docket Number:** 2689440 **Court:** [Insert relevant court name, if known] **Date:** [Insert the date of the decision or relevant hearings] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Jeffrey Lannes - **Defendant:** Flowserve U.S. **Background:** Jeffrey Lannes filed a lawsuit against Flowserve U.S., alleging [insert brief details about the nature of the complaint, e.g., wrongful termination, discrimination, personal injury, contractual dispute, etc.]. The key issue centers around [insert brief description of the main legal issue at hand]. **Facts:** [Summarize the relevant facts of the case, including important dates, the nature of the employment or business relationship, any incidents that led to the lawsuit, and the positions of both parties. Include any pertinent evidence presented in court, such as witness testimonies or documents.] **Legal Issues:** The main legal questions presented in the case involved [list the key legal issues, such as violations of specific laws, breach of contract, or tort claims]. **Rulings:** The court [insert findings or rulings issued by the court]. [Discuss any determinations on motions, summary judgment, or the results of a trial.] **Outcome:** The decision favored [insert which party prevailed, or if the case was settled out of court]. The court awarded [specify any damages, injunctions, or other remedies granted] to [the prevailing party]. **Significance:** This case is significant because [explain the broader implications or importance of the ruling, including how it may affect similar cases, lead to changes in legal interpretations, or influence industry practices]. **Conclusion:** Jeffrey Lannes v. Flowserve U.S. underscores important issues related to [insert relevant legal principles or societal issues addressed in the case]. The outcome illustrates the court's stance on [explain any notable takeaways or precedents that emerged from the ruling]. [Note: Fill in the placeholders with specific information as applicable. The case summary is intended to provide a concise overview tailored to legal professionals or interested parties.]

Jeffrey Lannes v. Flowserve U.S.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available