Legal Case Summary

Jerrell Johnson v. Stephen Rankin


Date Argued: Wed Sep 18 2013
Case Number: 14-20450
Docket Number: 2591484
Judges:J. Harvie Wilkinson III, Diana Gribbon Motz, Henry F. Floyd
Duration: 40 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Jerrell Johnson v. Stephen Rankin, Docket Number 2591484** **Court:** [Name of the Court] **Date:** [Date of the Decision] **Judges:** [Names of Judges] **Background:** Jerrell Johnson filed a lawsuit against Stephen Rankin, resulting in case number 2591484. The nature of the case involves [briefly describe the nature of the case, e.g., a personal injury claim, contract dispute, etc.]. **Facts:** On [specific date], the incident occurred that led to the litigation, wherein Johnson alleges [summarize the key facts of the case, including any relevant events that took place, and the actions taken by Rankin]. Johnson claims to have suffered damages as a result of Rankin’s actions, and seeks relief through the court system. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case include [list the main legal questions the court had to resolve, such as negligence, breach of contract, liability, etc.]. Johnson argues that [summarize the argument of the plaintiff], while Rankin contends that [summarize the defense's arguments]. **Ruling:** The court ruled in favor of [either Johnson or Rankin]. The court determined that [summarize the court's decision and any key points in the ruling]. **Reasoning:** In its decision, the court considered [mention any important legal precedents, statutes, or evidence that influenced the ruling]. The judge highlighted [summarize the reasoning behind the decision, including how the facts applied to legal standards]. **Conclusion:** As a result of the ruling, [explain the outcome, including any orders from the court, such as monetary damages, injunctions, or dismissals]. The decision in Jerrell Johnson v. Stephen Rankin serves as a precedent for [briefly mention the implications of the case for future legal matters or similar cases]. **Next Steps:** Depending on the ruling, either party may have the option to appeal the decision within [mention deadlines or procedural options]. --- Please note that the above summary is a template and should be filled with specific information pertinent to the case, including dates, relevant legal statutes, and detailed facts for accuracy and completeness.

Jerrell Johnson v. Stephen Rankin


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available