Case Summary
**Case Summary: Jerry Hartrim v. LVMPD**
**Docket Number:** 2650458
**Court:** [Assuming this is a state or federal court, please specify]
**Date:** [Insert relevant dates]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Jerry Hartrim
- **Defendant:** Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (LVMPD)
**Background:**
The case involves Jerry Hartrim as the plaintiff, who has brought a suit against the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. The specific circumstances of the case revolve around allegations made by Hartrim against the police department, which may involve claims such as excessive force, wrongful arrest, or violation of civil rights.
**Facts:**
- Jerry Hartrim alleges that he was subjected to unlawful actions by LVMPD officers during an incident that occurred [insert date and details of the incident].
- The plaintiff claims [insert specific allegations, such as mistreatment, violation of rights, or failure to follow proper procedures].
- The case stems from [insert any relevant context leading to the lawsuit, such as an arrest, police encounter, etc.].
**Legal Issues:**
- The primary legal issues revolve around [insert legal claims, such as constitutional violations, tort claims, or other relevant statutes].
- Questions of law include [insert specific legal standards that may be applicable, such as standard for excessive force, qualified immunity, etc.].
**Procedural History:**
- The case was filed in [insert court] on [insert date].
- Initial motions have included [insert notable motions, such as motions to dismiss, summary judgment, etc.].
- Discovery has revealed [insert any significant developments in the case].
**Outcome:**
As of the last available information, the case is ongoing. A decision has not yet been reached, and the court may be expected to rule on [insert any upcoming motions or court dates].
**Conclusion:**
The case of Jerry Hartrim v. LVMPD is significant in addressing pertinent issues related to police conduct and the rights of individuals in encounters with law enforcement. The outcome may have implications for policy, training, and legal standards governing police actions within the jurisdiction of the LVMPD.
**Next Steps:**
- Awaiting further motions or a potential ruling from the court regarding the ongoing litigation.
**Note:** This summary is a fictional representation and should not be considered a factual account of any real case. For actual case details, please reference legal documentation or court records.