Legal Case Summary

Jerry Valdivia v. Arnold Schwarzenegger


Date Argued: Mon Jan 11 2010
Case Number: 08-15889
Docket Number: 7848434
Judges:Noonan, Hawkins, Smith M.
Duration: 67 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Jerry Valdivia v. Arnold Schwarzenegger** **Docket Number:** 7848434 **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., Superior Court of California] **Date:** [Specify Date of Ruling] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Jerry Valdivia - **Defendant:** Arnold Schwarzenegger, in his capacity as [specify role, e.g., Governor of California] **Background:** Jerry Valdivia brought a case against Arnold Schwarzenegger regarding [briefly outline the nature of the dispute; this could involve claims of civil rights violations, personal injury, or other legal issues depending on the context of the case]. The case emerged from events that took place on [provide a brief context to the events leading to the lawsuit, if available]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal concerns in this case included [list the main legal issues raised, such as constitutional violations, negligence, wrongful termination, etc.]. The plaintiff asserted that the defendant's actions [explain the defendant's actions relevant to the case] led to [describe the harm or damages suffered by the plaintiff]. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Jerry Valdivia argued [summarize the main points of the plaintiff's argument, including claims for damages, legal precedent, or statutory interpretation]. - **Defendant's Argument:** Arnold Schwarzenegger's defense presented [summarize the defendant's main points, which may include arguments against liability, the applicability of defenses such as qualified immunity, or other legal strategies]. **Ruling:** [Briefly describe the outcome of the case and any rulings made by the court, including whether the court found in favor of the plaintiff or the defendant and any legal reasoning provided.] **Significance:** The ruling in Jerry Valdivia v. Arnold Schwarzenegger has implications for [discuss the broader implications of the case, such as precedential value, impact on public policy or individual rights, or relevance in contemporary legal discussions]. **Conclusion:** The case exemplifies [draw a conclusion based on the case outcome and its importance], contributing to ongoing discussions about [mention any relevant themes in law or society connected to the case]. [Note: This summary is a fictional representation and serves as an illustrative example. Please provide real details for accurate case representation.]

Jerry Valdivia v. Arnold Schwarzenegger


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available