Legal Case Summary

Jesse Solomon v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Pla


Date Argued: Tue May 09 2017
Case Number: 16-1730
Docket Number: 6060409
Judges:Diana Gribbon Motz, Dennis W. Shedd, Allyson K. Duncan
Duration: 31 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Jesse Solomon v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Players Retirement Plan** **Docket Number:** 6060409 **Court:** United States District Court **Background:** Jesse Solomon, a former professional football player, filed a lawsuit against the Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Players Retirement Plan. The retirement plan is designed to provide benefits to eligible former NFL players. Solomon challenged the decision made by the plan's administrator regarding his eligibility for benefits, claiming that he met the criteria set forth in the plan documentation. **Legal Issue:** The primary legal issue in this case revolves around the interpretation of the eligibility criteria for benefits under the Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Players Retirement Plan. Solomon contended that he fulfilled the requirements necessary to qualify for benefits, while the retirement plan's administrator asserted that he did not meet those specific criteria. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff:** Solomon argued that his playing time, the nature of his career in the NFL, and his contributions to the team should qualify him for the retirement benefits he sought. He provided evidence that he had complied with all necessary conditions as outlined in the plan's provisions. - **Defendant:** The NFL Players Retirement Plan's administrator maintained that Solomon's claims did not align with the defined eligibility parameters set by the plan. The administrator presented documentation and criteria that purportedly disqualified Solomon from receiving benefits. **Court's Analysis:** The court examined the specific language of the retirement plan, relevant case law, and the evidence provided by both parties. The court analyzed the intention behind the eligibility criteria and whether Solomon’s career and circumstances met those outlined in the retirement plan. **Outcome:** The court's decision addressed whether Solomon was entitled to the benefits he claimed. The ruling included considerations on the interpretation of pension plans, the deference given to plan administrators in decision-making, and the legal standards that guide the court's review of such cases. **Conclusion:** The case of Jesse Solomon v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Players Retirement Plan highlights the complexities involved in pension and retirement benefit disputes for former professional athletes. The outcome of the case underscored the importance of clear eligibility standards and the potential for legal recourse when former players challenge administrative decisions. Note: Further details regarding the specific ruling, including whether Solomon prevailed or the plan's decision was upheld, may require access to additional court documents or rulings.

Jesse Solomon v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Pla


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available