Legal Case Summary

Jessie Heredia v. Larry Small


Date Argued: Tue Jul 09 2013
Case Number: 12-55796
Docket Number: 7837522
Judges:Graber, Rawlinson, Watford
Duration: 36 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Jessie Heredia v. Larry Small** **Docket Number:** 7837522 **Court:** [Insert Name of Court] **Date:** [Insert Date of Decision] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Jessie Heredia - **Defendant:** Larry Small **Background:** The case involves a dispute between Jessie Heredia and Larry Small. The specifics of the case arise from [insert a brief description of the events leading to the lawsuit, such as contractual obligations, personal injury, property dispute, etc.]. Jessie Heredia initiated legal proceedings against Larry Small, seeking [insert the nature of relief sought, such as damages, injunction, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** The central legal questions presented in this case include: 1. [Insert first legal issue, e.g., breach of contract] 2. [Insert second legal issue, e.g., negligence or liability] 3. [Any other relevant legal issues] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Argument:** Jessie Heredia contends that [summarize the plaintiff's key arguments, including facts, legal precedent, and any applicable statutes]. - **Defendant’s Argument:** Larry Small counters by [summarize the defendant's key arguments, including any defenses raised, such as comparative negligence, lack of duty, etc.]. **Court's Analysis:** The court evaluated the evidence presented, which included [mention any key pieces of evidence, testimonies, or legal documents]. The court considered [explain the legal standards applied, relevant case law, or statutes]. **Ruling:** After thorough consideration, the court [insert the court’s ruling, e.g., granted summary judgment in favor of one party, dismissed the case, etc.]. The decision was based on [briefly outline the reasons for the court's decision, highlighting any legal precedents or principles applied]. **Conclusion:** The outcome of Jessie Heredia v. Larry Small has implications for [discuss any broader legal implications or precedents set by the case]. The case emphasizes [mention any key points such as the importance of contractual clarity, adherence to safety standards, etc.]. **Next Steps:** [If applicable, mention any planned appeals or further legal actions following the ruling.] --- Note: This is a generic format and should be tailored with specific details regarding the actual case for completeness and accuracy.

Jessie Heredia v. Larry Small


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available