Legal Case Summary

Jimmy Lazo v. Ken Clark


Date Argued: Mon Jun 14 2010
Case Number: 08-16838
Docket Number: 7847486
Judges:Panner, Schroeder, Bybee
Duration: 13 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Jimmy Lazo v. Ken Clark** **Docket Number:** 7847486 **Court:** [Specify Court - e.g., Superior Court, District Court] **Date:** [Specify Date] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Jimmy Lazo - **Defendant:** Ken Clark **Background:** This case revolves around a dispute between Jimmy Lazo and Ken Clark, focusing on a specific incident that led to legal proceedings. The specifics of the claims brought forth by Lazo against Clark involve allegations related to [briefly summarize the nature of the dispute, e.g., personal injury, breach of contract, etc.]. **Facts:** - Jimmy Lazo alleges that on [insert date], [describe what happened, e.g., details of the incident, actions taken by both parties, etc.]. - Lazo claims to have suffered [describe any injuries, damages, or losses]. - Ken Clark's response includes [briefly outline the defense provided by Clark, any counterclaims, or denial of the allegations]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case include: 1. [Specify legal issue #1 – e.g., negligence, liability, etc.] 2. [Specify legal issue #2 – if applicable] 3. [Mention any other pertinent legal principles or statutes]. **Procedural Posture:** - [Note the stage of the case – e.g., trial, motion for summary judgment, etc.] - [Discuss any motions filed by either party, or rulings made by the court if applicable]. **Court's Analysis:** - The court analyzed the evidence presented by both parties, including witness testimonies, documents, and any expert opinions. - Key considerations included [mention critical points that the judge appeared to focus on or any precedents referenced]. **Outcome:** - [Describe the final decision made by the court. Did the court rule in favor of Lazo or Clark? Were damages awarded?] - The court ordered [detail any specific remedies or obligations placed on either party]. **Implications:** This case sets a precedent for [discuss any broader implications, such as legal principles established, impact on future cases, etc.]. **Conclusion:** Jimmy Lazo v. Ken Clark serves as a significant case in the [specific area of law, such as personal injury, contract law, etc.] and highlights [provide a closing thought on the case's importance or learning points]. --- **Note:** Please fill in the specific details (such as the nature of the dispute, dates, etc.) as they apply to the actual case, as this summary is a template and requires concrete information to be accurate.

Jimmy Lazo v. Ken Clark


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available