Legal Case Summary

John Berge, III v. Marc Antrim


Date Argued: Wed May 22 2013
Case Number: 11-35428
Docket Number: 7837708
Judges:Tashima, Tallman, Smith
Duration: 23 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: John Berge, III v. Marc Antrim** **Docket Number:** 7837708 **Court:** [Insert relevant court name if known] **Date:** [Insert date of the case if available] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** John Berge, III - **Defendant:** Marc Antrim **Facts of the Case:** John Berge, III filed a lawsuit against Marc Antrim concerning [insert relevant facts about the dispute, e.g., a contractual disagreement, personal injury, property dispute, etc.]. The plaintiff claims that [summarize the plaintiff’s allegations and the basis of his claims against Antrim]. The defendant, Marc Antrim, responded to the allegations by [summarize the defendant’s arguments or defenses against the claims raised by Berge]. Antrim contends that [insert any relevant information regarding the defense strategy, including any counterclaims if applicable]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues presented in this case include: 1. [Insert legal issue #1] 2. [Insert legal issue #2, if applicable] 3. [Insert any other relevant legal questions surrounding the case] **Court Proceedings:** The court proceedings involved [summarize the key proceedings, such as motions filed, hearings, or any other significant legal actions taken by either party]. - [Highlight any critical rulings made by the court] **Outcome:** As of the latest information available, the court’s ruling on the case [insert the outcome or status of the case if known, such as a verdict, settlement, or ongoing proceedings]. The court’s decision was based on [briefly explain the rationale of the court's decision if known]. **Conclusion:** The case of John Berge, III v. Marc Antrim highlighted [insert any broader implications of the case or its significance in the legal context]. The resolution of this case may have further implications for [discuss any relevant legal principles or potential impact on similar future cases]. [Note: Specific details such as dates, court names, and the exact nature of the claims are necessary to provide a fully accurate case summary and should be included where applicable.]

John Berge, III v. Marc Antrim


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available