Case Summary
**Case Summary: John Dragus v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company**
**Docket Number:** 6232036
**Court:** [Specify relevant court if known, e.g., U.S. District Court for the [District]]
**Date Filed:** [Date of filing, if known]
**Judge:** [Name of the presiding judge, if known]
**Parties Involved:**
- Plaintiff: John Dragus
- Defendant: Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
**Background:**
This case concerns a dispute between John Dragus (the plaintiff) and Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (the defendant) regarding the denial of insurance benefits. The plaintiff claimed that the insurance policy provided by the defendant entitled him to benefits due to a specific condition or event, which the insurance company subsequently refused to cover.
**Facts of the Case:**
1. John Dragus held a disability insurance policy issued by Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company.
2. The plaintiff filed a claim for benefits under this policy, citing an inability to work due to a qualifying condition.
3. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company denied the claim, stating reasons related to policy exclusions, insufficient medical evidence, or failure to meet the policy's definition of disability.
4. The plaintiff appealed the decision, providing additional medical records and evidence in support of his claims.
5. The insurer maintained its position, leading the plaintiff to file a lawsuit seeking to overturn the denial and obtain the benefits owed.
**Legal Issues:**
The case presents several legal issues, including:
- Whether the insurance company’s denial of benefits was justified based on the terms of the insurance policy.
- Whether the plaintiff provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate entitlement to the benefits claimed.
- The applicability of ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act), which may govern the obligations of the insurance company, depending on the nature of the policy.
**Relief Sought:**
The plaintiff seeks:
- A reversal of the denial of benefits.
- Payment for benefits owed under the insurance policy.
- Potentially, attorney's fees and costs associated with the litigation.
**Current Status:**
As of the last update, the case is either proceeding through discovery, awaiting a motion for summary judgment, or set for trial. The specific developments will depend on how the court and the parties have progressed since the initiation of the lawsuit.
**Significance:**
This case reflects important issues in insurance law, particularly regarding claims handling and the obligations of insurance companies under their policies. It may set precedents related to the interpretation of policy terms and the evidentiary standards required to establish entitlement to insurance benefits.
**Note:** This summary is based on hypothetical details and may not reflect the actual case accurately. Please consult court records or legal databases for real case information.