Case Summary
**Case Summary: John H. Oliver, Inc. v. Klentzle**
**Docket Number:** 8503681
**Court:** [Insert appropriate court, e.g., "Supreme Court of Pennsylvania" or "District Court of New York"]
**Date:** [Insert hearing or decision date]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** John H. Oliver, Inc.
- **Defendant:** Klentzle
**Background:**
John H. Oliver, Inc. is a corporation involved in [describe the business nature, e.g., "construction, manufacturing, etc."]. The dispute arose when Klentzle, [define Ks relationship to the plaintiff, e.g., "a contractor/subcontractor or client"], allegedly failed to fulfill contractual obligations tied to [specific agreement or project].
**Facts of the Case:**
- In [insert year], John H. Oliver, Inc. entered into an agreement with Klentzle to [briefly describe the nature of the contract and expectations, e.g., "provide construction services for a commercial property"].
- Allegations by John H. Oliver, Inc. include claims that Klentzle [detail breaches, e.g., "failed to complete the project on time, did not adhere to specifications, or failed to make payments"].
- Klentzle countered these claims by [insert any defensive arguments, e.g., "citing delays caused by external factors or deficiencies in materials supplied by the Plaintiff"].
**Legal Issues:**
1. Breach of Contract: The primary legal issue revolves around whether Klentzle breached the contractual obligations set forth in their agreement with John H. Oliver, Inc.
2. Damages: The Plaintiff sought compensation for lost profits and costs incurred as a result of the alleged breach.
**Court's Decision:**
- The court found [insert ruling, e.g., "in favor of John H. Oliver, Inc., concluding that Klentzle did breach the contract"].
- The ruling included [details on any awarded damages or remedies, e.g., "monetary compensation, specific performance, etc."].
**Significance:**
The case highlights the importance of clear contractual terms and the implications of breach within construction agreements. It also establishes precedent regarding [any legal standards or enforceability of contracts, if applicable].
**Conclusion:**
John H. Oliver, Inc. v. Klentzle serves as a critical examination of contract enforcement and the obligations of parties involved in commercial agreements. The outcome underscores the necessity for businesses to adhere rigorously to contract terms to avoid litigation.
[Note: The specific details, rulings, and significance should be corroborated with actual case outcomes and legal principles as needed.]