Legal Case Summary

John Stahl v. United States


Date Argued: Mon Nov 01 2010
Case Number: 10-35006
Docket Number: 7846874
Judges:Fletcher B. , Fernandez, Bybee
Duration: 23 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: John Stahl v. United States** **Docket Number:** 7846874 **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., U.S. District Court, etc.] **Date:** [Specify Date of Decision or Filing] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** John Stahl - **Defendant:** United States of America **Background:** John Stahl filed a lawsuit against the United States, asserting claims that involve [insert type of claims, e.g., negligence, wrongful injury, breach of contract, etc.]. The case arose from [provide a brief description of the events leading to the lawsuit, including any relevant dates, circumstances, or actions taken by the involved parties]. **Issues:** The key issues in the case included: 1. [First Issue – e.g., Did the United States breach its duty of care towards John Stahl?] 2. [Second Issue – e.g., Is John Stahl entitled to damages, and if so, what amount?] 3. [Any other pertinent issue that was raised in the case.] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** John Stahl argued that [outline the plaintiff's main arguments, including any relevant statutes, regulations, or precedents cited]. - **Defendant's Argument:** The United States contended that [summarize the main points made by the defendant in its defense, including any counterarguments or legal defenses]. **Court's Decision:** The court [decided in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant, or reached a settlement]. The ruling included [summary of the judgment or order, including any awards, findings, or directions to the parties]. The court provided reasoning based on [mention any legal standards, interpretations of law, or precedents that the court relied upon]. **Conclusion:** This case illustrates [briefly highlight the significance of the ruling, its implications for future cases, or any particular legal principles it reinforces]. It underscores the balance between [state relevant legal principles or societal issues involved, if applicable]. [Optional: Note any dissenting opinions, appeals, or further proceedings anticipated, if relevant.] **End of Summary** Please replace placeholders and specific details with accurate information to reflect the actual case.

John Stahl v. United States


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available