Legal Case Summary

Jose Sauceda-Contreras v. M. Spearman


Date Argued: Thu Aug 30 2018
Case Number: 17-55044
Docket Number: 7786290
Judges:Wardlaw, Bybee, Ikuta
Duration: 22 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Jose Sauceda-Contreras v. M. Spearman** **Docket Number**: 7786290 **Court**: [Specify Court, e.g., United States District Court, State Supreme Court, etc.] **Date**: [Specify Date of Ruling or Filing] **Parties Involved**: - **Plaintiff**: Jose Sauceda-Contreras - **Defendant**: M. Spearman **Background**: This case involves a dispute between Jose Sauceda-Contreras and M. Spearman. The specifics of the case relate to [a brief general overview of the nature of the case, e.g., civil rights violations, criminal charges, employment disputes, etc.], wherein Sauceda-Contreras claims that actions taken by Spearman were unlawful or unjust. **Facts**: - Jose Sauceda-Contreras contends that [summarize the key facts that led to the legal action, such as dates, events, and specific actions taken by either party]. - M. Spearman has responded by [detail any defenses or counterclaims raised by Spearman]. **Issues**: 1. The primary legal issue at stake is [list the main legal questions or issues that the court needs to address, e.g., whether there was a violation of rights, interpretation of a statute, etc.]. 2. [Any secondary issues that may be relevant]. **Ruling**: The court ultimately ruled in favor of [indicate which party won or if the case was dismissed], stating that [summarize the court's reasoning or the legal principles upon which the decision was based]. The ruling highlighted [any important precedents or legal standards applied]. **Outcome**: As a result of the decision, [discuss the implications for both parties, e.g., damages awarded, injunctions issued, or any other relief granted]. **Significance**: This case sets a precedent for [discuss any broader impacts of the case, important legal principles established, or implications for future cases]. **Conclusion**: The case of Jose Sauceda-Contreras v. M. Spearman serves as an important examination of [mention relevant legal areas], influencing how similar cases may be approached by the courts in the future. (Note: Please ensure to verify and insert specific details related to the case as applicable, as the information provided above is generic and intended for illustrative purposes only.)

Jose Sauceda-Contreras v. M. Spearman


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available