Legal Case Summary

Joseph Anderson v. Eric H. Holder Jr.


Date Argued: Wed Feb 09 2011
Case Number: 09-70249
Docket Number: 7846380
Judges:Zouhary, Pregerson, Wardlaw
Duration: 49 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Joseph Anderson v. Eric H. Holder Jr.** **Docket Number:** 7846380 **Court:** [Specify the Court if known, e.g., United States Court of Appeals, or a particular District Court] **Date:** [Insert the date of the decision if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Petitioner/Appellant:** Joseph Anderson - **Respondent/Appellee:** Eric H. Holder Jr., in his capacity as the Attorney General of the United States **Background:** Joseph Anderson filed an appeal against Eric H. Holder Jr. regarding [briefly describe the nature of the case, such as an immigration issue, criminal appeal, civil rights matter, etc.]. The case stems from [provide context about the lower court's ruling or administrative decision, including any relevant facts that led to the appeal]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues presented in this case include: 1. [Issue 1: e.g., whether the lower court erred in its interpretation of the law] 2. [Issue 2: e.g., whether due process rights were violated] 3. [Additional issues if applicable] **Arguments:** - **Appellant's Argument:** Joseph Anderson contended that [summarize the key points of Anderson's argument, focusing on the legal basis for the appeal and any evidence or precedent cited]. - **Appellee's Argument:** Eric H. Holder Jr. defended the lower court's decision by asserting that [summarize the key points of the government's argument, highlighting the rationale behind the decision and any legal standards applied]. **Decision:** The court ultimately ruled in favor of [Indicate whether the court upheld, reversed, or remanded the lower court’s decision]. The court found that [summarize the court’s reasoning, touching on the main points discussed in the decision, how the law was applied, and any precedents that were cited]. **Implications:** This ruling has implications for [discuss the broader impact of the decision on similar cases, policies, or legal interpretations, particularly if it sets a precedent or alters existing legal standards]. **Conclusion:** In conclusion, the case of Joseph Anderson v. Eric H. Holder Jr. illustrates [summarize the significance of the case and the key takeaways from the court’s decision]. **Note:** This summary is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific case details, refer to the official court documents or legal counsel.

Joseph Anderson v. Eric H. Holder Jr.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available