Legal Case Summary

Julie Vawter v. ReconTrust Company


Date Argued: Thu Mar 13 2014
Case Number: 12-16346
Docket Number: 7836448
Judges:Farris, Reinhardt, Tashima
Duration: 19 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Julie Vawter v. Recontrust Company** **Docket Number:** 7836448 **Court:** [Insert appropriate court jurisdiction here] **Date:** [Insert relevant date of the case] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Julie Vawter - **Defendant:** Recontrust Company **Background:** This case involves a dispute between Julie Vawter, the plaintiff, and Recontrust Company, the defendant, regarding [insert specific issues, such as foreclosure, mortgage servicing, etc.]. Vawter alleges that Recontrust Company engaged in wrongful conduct related to [insert relevant allegations, such as improper handling of mortgage payments, failure to comply with legal procedures, etc.]. **Facts:** - Julie Vawter initiated the legal action against Recontrust Company after experiencing difficulties with [briefly mention the context, such as foreclosure proceedings, denial of loan modification, etc.]. - Vawter claims that [provide key facts supporting the plaintiff's arguments, such as evidence of notifications, lack of communication, or failure to adhere to statutory requirements]. - Recontrust Company, in its defense, argues that [summarize the company’s position and any counterarguments or defenses presented]. **Legal Issues:** The case raises several legal issues, including: 1. [Detail key legal questions, such as the validity of the foreclosure process, compliance with state and federal regulations, etc.] 2. [Include any potential allegations of negligence, breach of contract, or violations of consumer protection laws.] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Arguments:** - Vawter asserts that Recontrust Company failed to follow proper legal procedures and did not provide sufficient notice as required by law. - She seeks [state the remedies sought, e.g., monetary damages, injunctions, etc.]. - **Defendant's Arguments:** - Recontrust Company contends that they acted within the scope of the law and adhered to all necessary procedures in handling Vawter's account. - They argue that [summarize any defenses, such as lack of standing, the expiration of a statute of limitations, etc.]. **Outcome:** As of the most recent proceedings, the court has [provide information on any rulings made, such as motions filed, likelihood of trial, or any settlements discussed]. The case is ongoing, and further developments are expected as both parties prepare for [mention next steps, such as trial dates, hearings, etc.]. **Conclusion:** The case of Julie Vawter v. Recontrust Company highlights important issues regarding [summarize the broader implications, such as consumer rights in mortgage disputes, accountability of financial institutions, etc.]. The resolution of this case will have implications not only for the parties involved but also for similar cases in the future. **Note:** Specific details regarding the court's decisions, the dates of filing, and subsequent actions should be added as relevant to provide a complete overview of the case's progression.

Julie Vawter v. ReconTrust Company


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available