Legal Case Summary

Justin Ringgold-Lockhart v. County of Los Angeles


Date Argued: Mon Dec 02 2013
Case Number: 11-56973
Docket Number: 7836974
Judges:Pregerson, Berzon, Christen
Duration: 65 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Justin Ringgold-Lockhart v. County of Los Angeles** **Docket Number:** 7836974 **Court:** [Specify court if known, e.g., Superior Court, California] **Parties Involved:** - Plaintiff: Justin Ringgold-Lockhart - Defendant: County of Los Angeles **Background:** The case revolves around allegations made by Justin Ringgold-Lockhart against the County of Los Angeles. The details of the claims, including specific incidents, underlying facts, and the interactions between the plaintiff and the county, are crucial in understanding the legal grounds for the lawsuit. The nature of the case may involve issues such as civil rights violations, personal injury claims, or other grievances pertaining to actions taken by county officials or departments. **Claims:** The plaintiff argues that the County of Los Angeles is liable for [insert specific claims such as negligence, wrongful termination, discrimination, etc.]. The case may involve claims for damages incurred as a result of the county's actions or omissions. **Legal Issues:** Key legal issues potentially at play could include: - The determination of liability for the County of Los Angeles. - Whether the plaintiff's claims fall under any statutes or legal precedents that govern public entities. - The appropriateness of any defenses raised by the County of Los Angeles, such as sovereign immunity or procedural defenses. **Procedural History:** [Insert details about the procedural history, such as whether the case went to trial, if there were any significant motions filed, or whether it was settled pre-trial.] **Status:** As of the latest update, the status of the case is [insert whether it is ongoing, resolved, settled, etc.]. Any relevant court rulings, trial dates, or appeals should be noted here. **Significance:** This case may have broader implications regarding the accountability of public entities in California and the legal recourse available to individuals when claiming harm caused by government actions. **Conclusion:** Justin Ringgold-Lockhart v. County of Los Angeles serves as a notable case highlighting the interaction between individuals and governmental authorities, focusing on the legal principles surrounding [specific areas of law involved]. The outcome may establish important precedents for future similar cases. --- Note: The specifics regarding claims, legal issues, and status should be filled in based on the actual details of the case, which are not available in this summary.

Justin Ringgold-Lockhart v. County of Los Angeles


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available