Case Summary
**Case Summary: K. Lewis v. PBGC (Docket No. 6224979)**
**Court:** United States Court of Appeals
**Date:** [Insert the date of the decision, if available]
**Overview:**
K. Lewis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) is a notable case concerning the enforcement of pension plan obligations and the authority of the PBGC in overseeing pension benefit guarantees.
**Facts:**
K. Lewis, the petitioner, was a participant in a pension plan that came under the jurisdiction of the PBGC after the plan was terminated. Following the termination, Lewis filed a claim to recover benefits under the terms of the plan. The PBGC had responsibility for guaranteeing pension benefits for participants in terminated pension plans, which included assessing the claims made by the beneficiaries.
**Issue:**
The core issue in this case was whether the PBGC properly assessed and denied Lewis's claim for pension benefits based on the applicable regulations and statutes governing guaranteed benefits.
**Arguments:**
- **Petitioner Argument (K. Lewis):** Lewis argued that the PBGC had improperly calculated his pension benefits and failed to account for certain contributions and service credits that should have been included in determining his eligibility and the amount owed.
- **Respondent Argument (PBGC):** The PBGC contended that they followed the appropriate guidelines and regulations in determining the pension benefits owed to Lewis, asserting that their calculations were consistent with the plan’s termination provisions and applicable law.
**Decision:**
[Insert brief description of the court's ruling, including whether the court affirmed, reversed, or remanded PBGC's decision, along with any key legal reasoning that was central to the verdict.]
**Impact:**
This case emphasizes the role of the PBGC in managing terminated pension plans and securing the rights of plan participants. Additionally, it highlights the legal standards governing pension benefit calculations and the potential complexities involved in claims related to pension benefits. The outcome may influence future cases pertaining to pension benefit guarantees and the authority of the PBGC.
**Conclusion:**
The decision in K. Lewis v. PBGC serves as a crucial reference point for understanding the intricacies of pension benefit claims, the obligations of governmental bodies like the PBGC, and the rights of beneficiaries in terminated pension programs.
**Note:** Please add specific details regarding the decision, including the date of the ruling and any relevant judicial opinions, as they become available to complete this case summary.