Case Summary
**Case Summary: Kathie Costanich v. DSHS-APS**
**Docket Number:** 7850203
**Court:** [Specify the Court, e.g., Washington State Court of Appeals]
**Date:** [Specify the Date of the Decision]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff/Appellant:** Kathie Costanich
- **Defendant/Appellee:** Department of Social and Health Services - Adult Protective Services (DSHS-APS)
**Background:**
Kathie Costanich filed a legal action against the DSHS-APS concerning issues related to the agency's handling of adult protective services. The plaintiff alleged [specific allegations, such as improper investigation, failure to provide due process, or other related claims], which have significant implications for the treatment of vulnerable adults within the state.
**Facts:**
1. Kathie Costanich's case involved [briefly outline the situation, such as the circumstances prompting APS involvement, the nature of the allegations against an individual or institution, etc.].
2. The DSHS-APS conducted an investigation, leading to findings that [summarize findings].
3. Costanich contested the findings, asserting that [include specific points of contention].
**Legal Issues:**
The primary legal issues revolved around:
- Whether the DSHS-APS appropriately followed legal procedures in their investigation.
- The constitutionality of the methods employed by DSHS-APS during their assessment.
- The implications of the findings on Costanich’s rights and her ability to advocate for the individual involved.
**Decision:**
The court ruled in favor of [specify whether it was in favor of Costanich or DSHS-APS], and the decision was based upon [outline the rationale, referring to relevant statutes, case law, or precedent].
The court emphasized [summarize any key legal principles, standards applied, or findings that were significant in the judgment].
**Impact:**
This case has implications for the practices of DSHS-APS, particularly in ensuring due process and protecting the rights of both the vulnerable adults and the individuals accused. It may influence future protocols regarding adult protective services investigations.
**Conclusion:**
The outcome of Kathie Costanich v. DSHS-APS highlights the critical balance between safeguarding vulnerable adults and ensuring fair treatment for all parties involved in adult protective services investigations. The ruling may prompt reevaluation of policies and procedures within DSHS-APS, as well as foster greater awareness of legal rights among those subjected to APS investigations.
**Note:** Please specify court details, dates, and additional case facts as necessary based on the actual case documentation, as this summary is a generalized template and may necessitate specific modifications to match case particulars.