Legal Case Summary

Kathryn Potter v. Tina Hornbeck


Date Argued: Tue Feb 14 2012
Case Number: 11-15338
Docket Number: 7839731
Judges:Fletcher, Noonan, Paez
Duration: 22 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Kathryn Potter v. Tina Hornbeck** **Docket Number:** 7839731 **Court:** [Insert relevant court name] **Date:** [Insert relevant date or year if available] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Kathryn Potter - **Defendant:** Tina Hornbeck **Background:** The case of Kathryn Potter v. Tina Hornbeck revolves around a dispute that arose from [briefly describe the context of the case, e.g., a contractual disagreement, personal injury claim, property dispute, etc.]. Kathryn Potter, the plaintiff, alleges that Tina Hornbeck, the defendant, [insert specific allegations or issues being raised, e.g., breached a contract, caused an accident, etc.]. **Key Issues:** 1. Whether the actions of Tina Hornbeck constituted [specific legal issue, e.g., negligence, breach of contract, etc.]. 2. The extent of damages claimed by Kathryn Potter. 3. Possible defenses raised by Tina Hornbeck in response to the allegations. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Argument:** Kathryn Potter contends that [summarize the main points of plaintiff's argument, including any evidence or testimony provided]. - **Defendant’s Argument:** Tina Hornbeck argues that [summarize the main points of the defendant's argument, including any evidence or testimony provided]. **Legal Considerations:** The case hinges on [discuss any relevant statutes, regulations, or legal principles that may apply to the case]. The court must determine [outline the legal conclusions or determinations the court needs to make]. **Outcome:** As of the latest update, [insert outcome if available, e.g., the verdict, settlement details, or any orders issued by the court]. If the case is ongoing, mention any upcoming dates or hearings. **Conclusion:** The case of Kathryn Potter v. Tina Hornbeck highlights [briefly summarize the implications of the case, e.g., the legal principles involved, the impact on future cases, or any broader societal issues raised]. Further developments will be closely monitored as the litigation progresses. **Note:** Details of the case, including dates and specific legal arguments, should be filled in as per actual case documentation and status.

Kathryn Potter v. Tina Hornbeck


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available