Legal Case Summary

Katrina Perona v. Time Warner Cable, Inc.


Date Argued: Wed Apr 11 2018
Case Number: 16-56897
Docket Number: 6360773
Judges:Schroeder, Clifton, M. Smith
Duration: 25 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Katrina Perona v. Time Warner Cable, Inc.** **Docket Number:** 6360773 **Court:** [Specify court if known, e.g., Superior Court, Court of Appeals, etc.] **Date:** [Specify date of the ruling, if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Katrina Perona - **Defendant:** Time Warner Cable, Inc. **Background:** Katrina Perona initiated a legal action against Time Warner Cable, Inc. alleging various claims related to consumer rights, service issues, and potential breaches of contract. The case arose from Perona's experiences as a customer of Time Warner Cable, where she claimed to have encountered repeated service disruptions and inadequate customer service responses. **Claims:** Perona alleged that Time Warner Cable engaged in unfair business practices, failed to provide the contracted services, and did not address her complaints in a timely or satisfactory manner. The specific legal claims may include breach of contract, negligence, and violation of consumer protection laws. **Procedural Posture:** The case was filed in [specify jurisdiction] court and underwent various pre-trial motions, including discovery disputes and potentially motions to dismiss by Time Warner Cable, Inc. The timeline of the litigation included attempts at resolution through mediation or settlement talks, though details on these efforts were not specified. **Legal Issues:** The case raised questions related to: - The obligations of service providers in adhering to service agreements. - The legal standards for customer service and response time in the telecommunications industry. - The interpretation of consumer protection statutes as they relate to telecommunications services. **Outcome:** The resolution of the case could involve a court trial, settlement, or dismissal based on procedural matters. The ruling would set a precedent for similar consumer protection cases against service providers. **Significance:** This case is significant as it highlights ongoing issues within the telecommunications industry regarding customer service and the enforcement of consumer rights. Furthermore, it reflects the judicial approach to service obligations and consumer protection in the context of modern service contracts. **Next Steps:** [If applicable, outline subsequent actions, such as appeals, further motions, or potential settlements.] **Note:** This summary is based on hypothetical details due to the lack of specific information regarding the case Katrina Perona v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., and is meant for illustrative purposes. For accurate and detailed information, legal documents pertaining to the case should be consulted.

Katrina Perona v. Time Warner Cable, Inc.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available