Legal Case Summary

Kent Stahle v. CTS Corporation


Date Argued: Thu Sep 17 2015
Case Number: 13-0565
Docket Number: 2818115
Judges:James A. Wynn, Jr., Henry F. Floyd, Stephanie D. Thacker
Duration: 37 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Kent Stahle v. CTS Corporation, Docket No. 2818115** **Court:** [Specify Court if known, e.g., U.S. District Court, State Court] **Date of Filing:** [Insert Date] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Kent Stahle - **Defendant:** CTS Corporation **Case Background:** Kent Stahle filed a lawsuit against CTS Corporation, alleging a range of claims that include [specify legal claims, e.g., personal injury, negligence, product liability, breach of warranty, etc.]. The plaintiff argues that [briefly summarize the basis for the plaintiff's claims, e.g., due to injuries sustained from a defective product manufactured by the defendant]. **Key Facts:** - The incident in question occurred on [insert date of incident]. - Stahle claims that [provide specifics of the events leading to the lawsuit, the nature of the product or service involved, and the damages suffered]. - CTS Corporation denies liability, asserting [summarize the defendant's position, e.g., product met safety standards, plaintiff misused the product, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** The case raises several legal issues, including: - Whether CTS Corporation can be held liable for [specify the primary legal questions surrounding negligence, product safety, etc.]. - The applicability of any defenses raised by CTS Corporation, including [e.g., assumption of risk, contributory negligence, etc.]. **Procedural History:** - The plaintiff filed a complaint on [insert date], and the defendant responded with a motion to dismiss on [insert date]. - [Summarize any significant motions, hearings, or orders issued by the court up to this point]. **Current Status:** As of [insert date of last status update], the case is in [insert current procedural stage, e.g., awaiting trial, in mediation, etc.]. Both parties are engaged in [specify any ongoing discussions, negotiations, or discovery processes]. **Potential Outcome:** The potential outcomes of the case may include [describe possible outcomes, e.g., a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, settlement, dismissal, etc.], depending on the evidence presented and the court's rulings on legal issues. --- **Note:** Please consult the specific court's records or legal databases for detailed information about the case, as the information presented here is synthesized for illustrative purposes and may not reflect actual case details.

Kent Stahle v. CTS Corporation


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available