Case Summary
**Case Summary: Kevin Schriener v. Quicken Loans, Inc.**
**Docket Number:** 2599008
**Court:** [Insert Court Name and Jurisdiction]
**Filing Date:** [Insert Date of Filing]
**Case Type:** Civil Litigation - Contract Dispute
**Parties:**
- **Plaintiff:** Kevin Schriener
- **Defendant:** Quicken Loans, Inc.
**Background:**
The case involves a dispute between Kevin Schriener and Quicken Loans, Inc. regarding a financial transaction or agreement. The plaintiff, Schriener, alleges that Quicken Loans failed to fulfill certain obligations under the terms of a loan agreement. This may include claims related to misrepresentation, breach of contract, or improper lending practices.
**Facts:**
1. Kevin Schriener engaged Quicken Loans for mortgage financing.
2. Schriener alleges that Quicken Loans provided inadequate or misleading information while processing his loan application.
3. The plaintiff contends that as a result of the company's actions or inactions, he suffered financial harm, which may include excessive fees and unfavorable loan terms.
4. Quicken Loans denies the allegations and asserts that all actions taken were in compliance with the agreement and applicable laws.
**Legal Issues:**
- Whether Quicken Loans breached the loan agreement with Kevin Schriener.
- Whether the loan officer acted in a manner that constituted misrepresentation or bad faith.
- The extent of damages suffered by the plaintiff as a result of the alleged breach.
**Proceedings:**
- The case went through various stages, including pleadings, discovery, and pre-trial motions.
- Both parties may have engaged in settlement negotiations, but reports indicate that a resolution was not reached.
**Current Status:**
- The case is awaiting trial or a determination through motions filed before the court.
- A hearing date may be set, or further motions may be pending.
**Implications:**
The outcome of this case could impact standard practices in the mortgage lending industry, potentially influencing how disclosures are made and how lenders communicate terms to borrowers. A decision in favor of Schriener may lead to increased scrutiny of loan practices, while a ruling for Quicken Loans could uphold the current standards and practices in place.
**Note:** Further details, including specific legal arguments, evidence presented, and court rulings, would be necessary for a comprehensive understanding of the case. Please consult court records for the latest updates and detailed proceedings.