Case Summary
**Case Summary: Khong Khampunbuan v. Michael Astrue**
**Docket Number:** 7849620
**Court:** United States District Court
**Date:** [Exact date to be filled based on case detail]
**Overview:**
The case of Khong Khampunbuan v. Michael Astrue revolves around an appeal concerning the denial of social security disability benefits. The plaintiff, Khong Khampunbuan, contested the decision made by Michael Astrue, the former Commissioner of Social Security.
**Facts of the Case:**
Khong Khampunbuan applied for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), claiming an inability to work due to various medical conditions. Upon initial review and a subsequent hearing, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) ruled against Khampunbuan, concluding that he retained the capacity to perform a significant number of jobs available in the national economy. The plaintiff argued that the ALJ's decision was flawed due to a lack of substantial evidence supporting the determination and that the judge failed to adequately consider the medical evidence presented.
**Legal Issues:**
1. Whether the ALJ applied the correct legal standards in evaluating Khampunbuan's disability claim.
2. Whether the decision was backed by substantial evidence as required under the Social Security Act.
3. Whether the ALJ properly weighed the medical opinions and treated the limitations described in the evidence provided by Khampunbuan.
**Court's Analysis:**
The court reviewed the evidence presented, including medical records, testimonies from medical professionals, and the credibility of Khampunbuan's complaints regarding his limitations. The court examined the ALJ's reasoning and the procedural aspects of the hearing to determine if due process was observed.
**Ruling:**
The court ultimately ruled in favor of either remanding the case back to the ALJ for further proceedings or upholding the denial of benefits, depending on the findings related to the application of law and the sufficiency of evidence.
**Conclusion:**
The case highlights the complexities involved in disability claims and the rigorous standards that courts apply in reviewing ALJ decisions. It serves as a pertinent example of the struggle individuals may face in securing the benefits they seek through the Social Security Administration.
(Note: This case summary is a general representation based on common elements found in similar cases. Specific details such as dates and outcomes should be filled in based on actual case records.)