Case Summary
**Case Summary: Kim Decker v. Carolyn Colvin (Docket No. 4468954)**
**Court:** [Specify the court if known, e.g., United States District Court for the District of Columbia]
**Date:** [Specify the date of the decision if known]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Kim Decker
- **Defendant:** Carolyn Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
**Background:**
Kim Decker brought a case against Carolyn Colvin, challenging the decision of the Social Security Administration (SSA) regarding her application for Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB) under Title II of the Social Security Act. Decker claimed that she was unable to work due to various medical conditions, including [briefly outline relevant medical conditions or disabilities].
**Issues:**
The primary issues in this case involved:
1. Whether the SSA's Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) properly evaluated Decker's medical evidence and her functional capacity.
2. Whether the ALJ's denial of disability benefits was supported by substantial evidence.
**Procedural History:**
Decker initially filed her application for benefits in [insert date of application]. After the SSA denied her claim, she requested a hearing before an ALJ, which took place on [insert date of hearing]. The ALJ subsequently issued a decision denying benefits on [insert date of decision]. Decker then sought judicial review of the ALJ's decision, leading to this case.
**Decision:**
The [court's name] reviewed the evidence presented, including medical records, testimonies, and the ALJ's reasoning. The court evaluated whether the ALJ had applied the correct legal standards in assessing Decker's disability claim and whether the findings were backed by substantial evidence.
**Outcome:**
The court [decided in favor of Plaintiff/Defendant], ruling that [briefly summarize the court's decision, e.g., the ALJ's decision was affirmed/reversed, and benefits were granted/denied]. The court found that [mention key findings or legal interpretations], thereby concluding that [insert conclusion].
**Significance:**
This case highlights the complexities involved in Social Security disability claims and emphasizes the importance of comprehensive evaluations by the ALJ. The decision serves as a precedent regarding [any relevant legal principles established].
**Note:** For complete insights regarding the case specifics, including relevant statutes or case law cited, consult the official court documents or legal databases.
---
Please fill in the placeholders with known details to enhance the accuracy of the case summary. If you require more specific information, please provide additional context or data.