Legal Case Summary

Kim Strickland v. Heather Halsey


Date Argued: Tue Mar 24 2015
Case Number: 517417
Docket Number: 2644803
Judges:James A. Wynn Jr., Henry F. Floyd, Pamela A. Harris
Duration: 46 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Kim Strickland v. Heather Halsey** **Docket Number:** 2644803 **Court:** [Insert Court Name Here] **Date:** [Insert Date Here] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Kim Strickland - **Defendant:** Heather Halsey **Background:** Kim Strickland initiated legal proceedings against Heather Halsey, concerning a dispute that arose from [briefly describe the nature of the dispute, e.g., a contractual agreement, personal injury, property damage, etc.]. The case encapsulates issues of [state the legal issues at stake, such as breach of contract, negligence, etc.]. **Facts of the Case:** - On [insert relevant dates], Kim Strickland and Heather Halsey were involved in [describe the incident or agreement that led to the dispute]. - Subsequent events led to [outline the progression of the conflict, including any actions taken by either party, communication breakdowns, etc.]. - Strickland claims that Halsey [summarize the plaintiff's main assertions or complaints against the defendant, emphasizing any alleged damages or injuries]. - Halsey responded by [include a brief overview of the defendant's counterarguments or defenses]. **Legal Issues:** The case primarily revolves around [discuss the key legal questions the court is being asked to resolve, such as liability, damages, etc.]. The court is tasked with determining [state what the outcome could hinge upon, including any relevant laws or precedents]. **Procedural History:** - The case was filed on [insert filing date], and a series of motions and hearings followed, including [mention any significant rulings or procedural events]. - [If applicable, mention any pre-trial motions, discovery disputes, or settlements attempted prior to trial.] **Outcome:** [If the case has been resolved, provide the verdict or settlement outcome. If not resolved, mention the current status, such as upcoming trial dates or hearings.] **Conclusion:** The case of Kim Strickland v. Heather Halsey highlights [summarize the implications of the case, potential effects on the parties involved, or broader legal principles addressed]. The ruling in this case could have significant ramifications for [insert relevant industry or area of law affected]. (Note: Please fill in any specific details and dates that are relevant to the case to complete this summary.)

Kim Strickland v. Heather Halsey


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available