Case Summary
**Case Summary: Kimberly Asper v. Costco Wholesale, Docket Number 2627324**
**Court:** [Insert Court Name]
**Date:** [Insert Date of Ruling]
**Parties:** Kimberly Asper (Plaintiff) vs. Costco Wholesale (Defendant)
**Docket Number:** 2627324
**Background:**
The case of Kimberly Asper v. Costco Wholesale involves a personal injury claim filed by the plaintiff, Kimberly Asper, against the defendant, Costco Wholesale. The plaintiff alleged that she sustained injuries due to an incident that occurred on the defendant's premises.
**Facts of the Case:**
On [insert date of incident], Kimberly Asper was shopping at a Costco store when she allegedly slipped and fell due to [describe the condition that caused the fall, e.g., spilled merchandise, a slippery surface, etc.]. Asper claimed that the hazardous condition had existed for a sufficient amount of time such that Costco employees should have been aware of it and taken corrective action to prevent the accident.
**Claims:**
Asper filed a lawsuit seeking damages for her injuries, which included [list injuries if relevant], medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. The primary legal theory upon which she based her claim was negligence, asserting that Costco failed to maintain a safe environment for its customers.
**Defendant's Argument:**
Costco Wholesale denied the allegations, arguing that they had taken reasonable steps to ensure the safety of their store. The defendant contended that they had a comprehensive maintenance protocol in place, including regular inspections of the premises. Costco argued that the plaintiff was either responsible for her own injuries or that the incident was an unavoidable accident.
**Court Proceedings:**
The case was filed in [insert court] on [insert filing date]. Discovery consisted of the exchange of documents, depositions of parties, and witness statements. The defendant moved for summary judgment, asserting that there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate negligence. The court held hearings on the motion and examined the evidence presented by both parties.
**Ruling:**
[Insert the court's ruling and any key findings, including whether the motion for summary judgment was granted or denied, and the rationale behind the decision.]
**Conclusion:**
The case of Kimberly Asper v. Costco Wholesale highlights important aspects of premises liability and the duty of care owed by property owners to their customers. The ruling in this case will serve as a precedent for similar claims addressing slip and fall incidents within retail environments.
**Next Steps:**
Depending on the ruling, parties may proceed to trial if the motion for summary judgment was denied, or the case may be dismissed if judgment was granted in favor of Costco. Appeals may also be possible based on the final decision of the court.
---
**Note:** Please fill in the specific details such as court name, dates, and any significant rulings as applicable to the case for accuracy.