Legal Case Summary

Kimberly Crepea v. Cochise County


Date Argued: Wed Jul 06 2016
Case Number: 14-16694
Docket Number: 4108497
Judges:Berzon, N.R. Smith, Zouhary
Duration: 33 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Kimberly Crepea v. Cochise County** **Docket Number:** 4108497 **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date:** [Insert Date of Decision] **Judges:** [Insert Judges' Names] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Kimberly Crepea - **Defendant:** Cochise County **Facts of the Case:** Kimberly Crepea filed a lawsuit against Cochise County, asserting claims related to [insert brief description of the underlying facts], which has caused her to suffer [insert details about harm suffered, if applicable]. The case arose from events that took place on [insert relevant dates or timeline], during which Ms. Crepea alleges that the actions (or lack of action) by Cochise County led to [specify the issue at hand, e.g., negligence, violation of rights, etc.]. **Issues:** The main legal issues in this case revolve around [insert legal issues, e.g., compliance with local laws, negligence, failure to act, etc.]. Ms. Crepea contends that the county did not fulfill its obligations, which resulted in [describe the alleged outcome]. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Kimberly Crepea argues that Cochise County was negligent in its duties, breached its responsibilities, and that these failures led directly to the harm she experienced. She seeks [insert desired damages or remedies, such as compensation, injunctive relief, etc.]. - **Defendant's Argument:** Cochise County contends that they acted within the scope of their authority and fulfilled all relevant duties towards Ms. Crepea. The defense may argue that [insert any additional defenses raised, such as immunity, lack of foreseeability, etc.]. **Ruling:** The court [insert ruling, e.g., granted a motion to dismiss, ruled in favor of the plaintiff, etc.]. In its decision, the court emphasized [insert key points from the ruling, such as interpretations of law, findings of fact, etc.]. **Conclusion:** This case highlights important issues regarding [insert broader implications or legal principles involved, such as governmental responsibility, personal rights, etc.]. The outcome has implications for [describe any potential effects on future cases, local governance, or public policy, if applicable]. **Next Steps:** Following this ruling, [insert any next steps, such as potential appeals, further proceedings, etc.]. The parties may look to resolve the matter out of court or pursue additional legal remedies as provided under the law. **Note:** This summary is based on publicly available information and the specific details of the case may vary. For precise information, refer directly to court documents or legal counsel.

Kimberly Crepea v. Cochise County


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available