Legal Case Summary

King Lum v. Kauai County Council


Date Argued: Wed Oct 14 2009
Case Number: 08-16093
Docket Number: 7848888
Judges:Beezer, Graber, Fisher
Duration: 33 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: King Lum v. Kauai County Council** **Docket Number:** 7848888 **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., Circuit Court, Appellate Court] **Date:** [Specify Date if applicable] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff/Appellant:** King Lum - **Defendant/Appellee:** Kauai County Council **Background:** This case centers around a dispute involving King Lum and the Kauai County Council. The nature of the dispute is related to [insert a brief summary of the issues at hand, such as zoning regulations, environmental concerns, or local governance matters]. **Facts:** - King Lum filed a complaint against the Kauai County Council, raising issues related to [specifics of the complaint, such as alleged violations of rights, improper permits, or procedural errors]. - The Kauai County Council, as the governing body, is responsible for [insert relevant duties or areas of authority that pertain to the case]. - [Include any significant events or documents filed, such as previous rulings, motions, or evidence submitted by both parties]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case include: 1. [Issue 1 - e.g., Whether the Kauai County Council violated local or state laws in their decision-making process.] 2. [Issue 2 - e.g., Whether King Lum has standing to bring this lawsuit against the Council.] 3. [Issue 3 - e.g., The interpretation of specific land use regulations or zoning ordinances relevant to the matter.] **Court's Analysis:** - The court examined [details of the arguments presented by both parties, including legal precedents or statutory interpretations relied upon]. - The ruling took into account [any relevant facts that influenced the court’s decision, such as prior cases or public interests]. **Decision:** The court ruled in favor of [Plaintiff or Defendant], concluding that [summarize the core findings and rationale behind the court's decision]. The court emphasized [points of law or fact that were particularly significant to the ruling]. **Impact:** This decision has implications for [discuss the potential consequences of the ruling for King Lum, the Kauai County Council, or the broader community]. It may set a precedent for future cases involving [relevant issues of governance, land use, etc.]. **Conclusion:** The case of King Lum v. Kauai County Council illustrates [summarize key takeaways regarding legal principles, governance, or community engagement]. The decision reaffirms [discuss any broader legal principles upheld or challenged through this case]. **Note:** For a comprehensive understanding and accurate details including dates, specific laws cited, and precise court rulings, please consult the official court documents or legal databases.

King Lum v. Kauai County Council


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available