Legal Case Summary

King v. Runnels


Date Argued: Tue Nov 18 2008
Case Number: 07-17083
Docket Number: 7851238
Judges:Fernandez, Nelson, Thomas
Duration: 16 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: King v. Runnells** **Docket Number**: 7851238 **Court**: [Specify the court if known, e.g., District Court, Court of Appeals] **Date**: [Specify the date of the decision if known] **Parties**: - **Plaintiff**: King - **Defendant**: Runnells **Facts**: In the case of King v. Runnells, the plaintiff, King, filed a lawsuit against the defendant, Runnells, alleging [briefly state the nature of the claim, e.g., breach of contract, negligence, etc.]. The conflict arose from [provide a brief background of the events leading to the suit, such as a transaction, contract dispute, or incident]. **Issues**: The primary legal issues in this case include: 1. [Issue 1: Clearly state a legal question, e.g., whether Runnells breached their duty in a contractual agreement.] 2. [Issue 2: State any additional relevant question, e.g., whether King suffered damages as a result of Runnells' actions.] **Arguments**: - **Plaintiff's Argument**: King contended that [summarize the key points of the plaintiff's argument, including any evidence or legal precedents presented]. They asserted that [describe the relief sought, such as damages, specific performance, etc.]. - **Defendant's Argument**: Runnells countered that [summarize the key points of the defendant's argument, including any defenses raised, such as lack of liability, agreement terms, etc.]. They maintained that [describe any counterclaims or additional defenses]. **Ruling**: The court [decided not to decide, or ruled in favor of either party; summarize the court’s ruling and its rationale]. The court found that [briefly state the basis for the decision, referencing any applicable laws or precedents]. **Conclusion**: The case of King v. Runnells underscores [briefly discuss the broader implications or significance of the case, particularly in relation to the area of law it pertains to]. The ruling has the potential to impact [mention any relevant factors, such as future cases, contractual obligations, etc.]. **Note**: This summary is based on generic case details. For an accurate summary, specific details related to the case must be included based on the actual court documents and outcomes.

King v. Runnels


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available