Legal Case Summary

Klingelhoets v. Charlton-Perrin


Date Argued: Thu Oct 11 2012
Case Number: 1-11-2412
Docket Number: 3089610
Judges:Not available
Duration: 24 minutes
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois

Case Summary

Case Summary: Klingelhoets v. Charlton-Perrin, Docket No. 3089610 **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date:** [Insert Date of Decision] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Klingelhoets - **Defendant:** Charlton-Perrin **Facts:** Klingelhoets initiated legal action against Charlton-Perrin, stemming from a dispute that arose during their contractual relationship. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant failed to fulfill certain obligations as outlined in their agreement, resulting in damages to the plaintiff. **Issues:** 1. Whether the defendant breached the terms of the contract. 2. The extent of damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the alleged breach. 3. The applicability of any defenses raised by the defendant. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Klingelhoets contended that Charlton-Perrin's failure to deliver services/products as promised constituted a breach of contract, which led to specific financial losses. The plaintiff sought compensation for those damages as well as any additional relief the court deemed appropriate. - **Defendant's Argument:** Charlton-Perrin argued that any failure to perform was justifiable due to unforeseeable circumstances or that the plaintiff did not sufficiently mitigate their damages. The defendant may have raised issues concerning the validity of the plaintiff's claims or the interpretation of the contract terms. **Ruling:** The court's decision addressed both the breach of contract claim and the assessment of damages. [Insert specific ruling details, including whether the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff or the defendant, and any orders regarding compensation or other remedies.] **Conclusion:** The Klingelhoets v. Charlton-Perrin case highlights important considerations in contract disputes, including the necessity of adhering to agreement terms and the implications of breach on both parties. The ruling provides legal precedents regarding damages and contract interpretation. **Note:** For detailed legal reasoning, citations, and specific findings, refer to the official court documents or legal databases.

Klingelhoets v. Charlton-Perrin


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available