Legal Case Summary

Kouzoukas v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund


Date Argued: Tue May 19 2009
Case Number: 106976
Docket Number: 3082910
Judges:Not available
Duration: 43 minutes
Court Name: Illinois Supreme Court

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Kouzoukas v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund, Docket No. 3082910** **Court:** [Insert relevant court name, if available] **Date:** [Insert decision date, if available] **Overview:** In "Kouzoukas v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund," the plaintiff, Kouzoukas, challenged decisions made by the Retirement Board regarding the management of the Policemen’s Annuity and Benefit Fund. The central issues revolve around pension rights and benefits entitlement within the framework set by the fund's governing laws. **Facts:** - The plaintiff, Kouzoukas, was a participant in the Policemen’s Annuity and Benefit Fund, which provides retirement benefits to law enforcement personnel. - Following his retirement, Kouzoukas claimed that the Retirement Board improperly calculated his pension benefits, leading to an underpayment. - The dispute prompted Kouzoukas to seek a review of the Board’s decision, arguing that the calculation did not adhere to the established guidelines and regulations governing the fund. **Legal Issues:** - The primary issues presented in this case include: 1. Whether the Retirement Board properly interpreted and applied the statutes governing the calculation of pension benefits. 2. Whether Kouzoukas was entitled to any adjustments or additional benefits based on his service and contributions to the fund. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff (Kouzoukas):** Argued that the Retirement Board’s calculations were inconsistent with prior practices and the statutory framework, asserting that he was entitled to a reevaluation of his pension benefits. - **Defendant (Retirement Board):** Contended that they complied with all relevant laws and regulations in determining Kouzoukas’ benefits and that their calculations were supported by the evidence and consistent with board policy. **Ruling:** - [Insert court ruling or decision if available; alternatively, indicate the nature of judgment or outcome in general terms, e.g., "The court ruled in favor of Kouzoukas," or "The court upheld the Retirement Board's decision."] **Conclusion:** The case of "Kouzoukas v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund" highlights the complexities surrounding pension entitlements for police officers. It addresses critical aspects of statutory interpretation and the responsibilities of retirement boards in ensuring equitable treatment of beneficiaries. The decision reinforces or clarifies the applicable laws governing retirement benefits in the context of public employment. **Keywords:** Pension benefits, Retirement Board, Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund, statutory interpretation, equitable treatment

Kouzoukas v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available