Legal Case Summary

Kris Indergard v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation


Date Argued: Thu Jun 04 2009
Case Number: 08-35278
Docket Number: 7849972
Judges:Goodwin, O'scannlain, Fisher
Duration: 24 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Kris Indergard v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation** **Docket Number:** 7849972 **Court:** [Specify the court if known, e.g., United States District Court, State Court, etc.] **Date Filed:** [Insert date] **Plaintiff:** Kris Indergard **Defendant:** Georgia-Pacific Corporation ### Background: Kris Indergard filed a lawsuit against Georgia-Pacific Corporation, alleging [briefly outline the nature of the claims, e.g., employment discrimination, personal injury, breach of contract, etc.]. The plaintiff claims that [summarize the plaintiff's allegations, providing context about what led to the lawsuit]. ### Facts: 1. **Employment Details:** Kris Indergard was employed by Georgia-Pacific Corporation as [insert job title/role] from [insert start date] until [insert end date or current status]. 2. **Allegations:** Indergard alleges that [detail specific actions or incidents that form the basis of the case, e.g., discriminatory practices, unsafe working conditions, wrongful termination, etc.]. 3. **Workplace Environment:** The plaintiff contends that the workplace environment at Georgia-Pacific created conditions that were [describe conditions, e.g., hostile, dangerous, discriminatory]. ### Legal Issues: The primary legal issues raised in this case include: - [Insert any specific laws or regulations that are relevant to the case, e.g., Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, OSHA regulations, etc.] - [Any allegations regarding violations of state/federal law] ### Relief Sought: Kris Indergard is seeking [insert what the plaintiff is asking for, e.g., compensatory damages, punitive damages, reinstatement, etc.], asserting that [summarize the basis for the requested relief]. ### Current Status: As of [insert date], the case is at [describe the status, e.g., pre-trial phase, trial, settlement discussions]. The parties [insert any recent developments, e.g., filed motions, reached a settlement, scheduled for trial]. ### Conclusion: The case of Kris Indergard v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation highlights [summarize the significance of the case, potential implications, or the importance of the issues at stake]. The outcome will [discuss expected implications for the plaintiff, defendant, or industry]. --- *Note: The above is a generic template for summarizing a legal case. Specific details about the case, including claims, facts, and legal issues, should be filled in based on the actual case information.*

Kris Indergard v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available