Legal Case Summary

Kurz v. The Stanley Works


Date Argued: Thu Jan 23 2014
Case Number: 2-12-1429-2-13-0360-cons
Docket Number: 3083232
Judges:Not available
Duration: 46 minutes
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Kurz v. The Stanley Works, Docket Number 3083232** **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date:** [Insert Date] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Kurz - **Defendant:** The Stanley Works **Case Overview:** Kurz v. The Stanley Works involves a legal dispute where the plaintiff, Kurz, brought action against the defendant, a manufacturing company, The Stanley Works. The case centers around issues related to [insert specific legal issues such as employment law, product liability, breach of contract, etc.]. **Facts of the Case:** 1. **Background:** The plaintiff, Kurz, was employed by The Stanley Works as [insert job title] during the period of [insert employment duration]. 2. **Incident:** [Detail the incident or events leading to the dispute, including dates, actions taken, and the nature of the complaint]. 3. **Claims:** Kurz filed a complaint alleging [insert specific claims, such as wrongful termination, workplace discrimination, failure to pay wages, etc.]. The plaintiff contended that [insert key arguments made by the plaintiff]. **Legal Issues:** The central legal issues in this case pertain to: - [List and elaborate on the legal issues involved, such as employment law, contractual obligations, or other relevant statutes]. **Court's Findings:** [Detail the findings or decisions made by the court regarding the case. This may include any rulings on motions, conclusions on the legal issues presented, or determinations about the credibility of evidence.] **Outcome:** - The court ruled in favor of [insert which party won the case] on [insert date]. - Remedies sought by the successful party included [compensation, reinstatement, etc.]. **Significance:** This case serves as a precedent for [insert relevant significance, such as implications for employment law, interpretations of contracts, standards for liability, etc.]. It highlights the court's stance on [insert key takeaways]. **Conclusion:** Kurz v. The Stanley Works emphasizes the importance of [summarize the main messages of the case]. As legal standards and interpretations continue to evolve, this case contributes to the ongoing dialogue in [insert relevant area of law]. **Note:** For detailed information and specific legal analysis, please consult more comprehensive legal sources or seek professional legal advice. --- Please adjust the details as necessary since the specifics of the case's legal issues and outcomes were not provided.

Kurz v. The Stanley Works


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available