Legal Case Summary

Landa v. Barnhart


Date Argued: Fri Jun 13 2008
Case Number: 06-16970
Docket Number: 7852035
Judges:Schroeder, Smith, Walker
Duration: 16 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

Case Summary: Landa v. Barnhart Docket Number: 78-52035 **Court:** [Specific court where the case was heard, if known] **Date:** [Specific date or range of dates relevant to the case] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Landa - **Defendant:** Barnhart (presumably a governmental figure, potentially related to Social Security Administration) **Background:** The case of Landa v. Barnhart emerged from issues surrounding [insert specific legal matter, e.g., Social Security benefits, employment disputes, etc.]. The plaintiff, Landa, sought relief from decisions or actions taken by the defendant, Barnhart, which adversely affected Landa’s rights or benefits. **Legal Issues:** The central legal issues addressed in this case included: 1. [Issue 1: e.g., whether Landa met the qualifications for Social Security benefits] 2. [Issue 2: e.g., whether Barnhart's decision was arbitrary and capricious] 3. [Any other relevant legal principles] **Facts:** - Landa applied for [specific benefits or claims] on [date], facing [describe the initial decision and circumstances surrounding it]. - Barnhart, in an official capacity, issued a ruling or decision on [date], [briefly describe the outcome of this decision]. - Landa contested this decision, arguing [summarize the claims made by Landa against Barnhart’s ruling]. **Court’s Findings:** The court evaluated the evidence presented, including [mention any key documents, testimonies, or evidentiary issues]. The findings included: - Analysis of relevant laws, including [insert any statutes or regulations that were pivotal]. - Consideration of [mention any precedents or legal principles discussed by the court]. **Conclusion:** The court ultimately decided [briefly summarize the ruling or outcome of the court’s decision, including whether Landa's claims were upheld or dismissed]. The implications of this ruling [discuss the broader impact of the decision, if relevant, on Landa and similar cases]. **Outcome:** - The court ruled in favor of [Landa/Barnhart], leading to [describe any order, such as an award of benefits, remand for further consideration, etc.]. This case serves as a notable example of [discuss any significant precedents it may establish, procedural issues it highlights, or broader implications in the context of similar law]. **Note:** This summary is a general representation and should be reviewed alongside court documents for specific legal and procedural accuracy.

Landa v. Barnhart


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available