Legal Case Summary

Lanell Jones v. City of Oakland


Date Argued: Wed Jun 10 2015
Case Number: 14-3405
Docket Number: 2663599
Judges:Schroeder, Ikuta, Christen
Duration: 23 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Lanell Jones v. City of Oakland** **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., Superior Court of California, Alameda County] **Docket Number:** 2663599 **Date:** [Insert Date of Document] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Lanell Jones - **Defendant:** City of Oakland **Background:** Lanell Jones filed a lawsuit against the City of Oakland, alleging [insert the nature of the claim, e.g., wrongful termination, discrimination, violation of civil rights, etc.]. The case centers around events that occurred on or about [insert relevant dates, if applicable]. **Facts:** 1. **Incident Overview:** [Provide a brief description of the incident or events leading to the lawsuit, including any relevant details regarding the plaintiff’s claims against the city.] 2. **Allegations:** Jones claims that the City of Oakland [insert specific allegations made by Jones, such as unlawful action, failure to adhere to policy, etc.]. 3. **City's Response:** The City of Oakland [insert the city's defenses or counterclaims, if applicable, and any relevant actions taken by the city in response to the allegations]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case involve [insert key legal questions, e.g., whether the actions of the City constituted a violation of rights or statutory provisions, potential defenses, etc.]. **Procedural History:** - The case was initiated on [insert date of filing]. - [Briefly outline important procedural steps, such as motions filed, hearings conducted, or any settlement discussions.] **Current Status:** The case is currently [insert status, e.g., awaiting trial, pending a decision on a motion, etc.]. **Conclusion:** This case highlights [insert brief commentary on the implications of the case, such as its significance for employment law, civil rights enforcement, etc.]. The outcome may impact how municipalities address similar claims in the future. Further updates will be provided as the case progresses. [Note: Due to the general nature of the summary, please fill in the specific details denoted in brackets based on actual case information or context.]

Lanell Jones v. City of Oakland


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available