Legal Case Summary

Larkin Simmons v. Citibank


Date Argued: Tue Feb 10 2015
Case Number: M2013-01650-CCA-R3-CD
Docket Number: 2633259
Judges:Thomas, Tashima, McKeown
Duration: 16 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Larkin Simmons v. Citibank (Docket Number: 2633259)** **Court:** [Specify Court if known, e.g., U.S. District Court, State Court] **Date:** [Specify Date if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Larkin Simmons - **Defendant:** Citibank **Background:** Larkin Simmons filed a lawsuit against Citibank, asserting claims related to [briefly outline the nature of the case, e.g., wrongful denial of credit, breach of contract, fraud, etc.]. The dispute arose when [describe the circumstances leading to the lawsuit, including any relevant transactions, interactions, or events]. **Claims:** Simmons alleges that Citibank [detail the specific claims made by Simmons, such as failure to uphold certain contractual obligations, negligence, violations of consumer protection laws, etc.]. The plaintiff argues that these actions resulted in [describe the damages or injuries claimed by Simmons, such as financial losses, emotional distress, etc.]. **Defendant's Response:** Citibank denied the allegations, contending that [summarize Citibank's defenses and arguments, including any relevant facts or legal principles they cite, such as adherence to regulatory standards, proper protocols being followed, etc.]. The bank may argue that [highlight any counterclaims or defenses raised by Citibank]. **Proceedings:** The case has progressed through [mention key procedural steps, such as motions to dismiss, discovery processes, any hearings or trials, etc.]. Both parties have provided evidence and witness testimonies to support their respective claims and defenses. **Current Status:** As of the latest update, [provide the current procedural status of the case, e.g., pending trial, motions filed, settlement discussions, etc.]. The court may [mention any scheduled court dates or deadlines if known]. **Significance:** This case is significant because [briefly explain the broader implications, such as potential impacts on consumer rights, banking practices, or financial regulations]. The outcome may [discuss possible consequences for either party or the industry as a whole]. --- **Note:** Please fill in any specific details regarding the court, dates, and claims as they pertain to the actual case, which may not be available without further research.

Larkin Simmons v. Citibank


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available