Legal Case Summary

Latiolais v. Merck & Co.


Date Argued: Wed Oct 22 2008
Case Number: 07-55436
Docket Number: 7851424
Judges:Callahan, Ikuta, Shubb
Duration: 32 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Latiolais v. Merck & Co.** **Docket Number:** 7851424 **Court:** [Specify jurisdiction if known] **Date:** [Specify date of the decision or filing] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** [Plaintiff’s name, Terry Latiolais] - **Defendant:** Merck & Co., Inc. **Background:** Terry Latiolais filed a lawsuit against Merck & Co., a pharmaceutical company, alleging that the defendant's product caused significant harm to her health. The case centers around the safety and efficacy of a medication manufactured by Merck, raising questions about the adequacy of the warnings provided by the company regarding the risks associated with its use. **Legal Issues:** The case involves claims of: - Product liability - Negligence - Failure to warn - Breach of warranty The plaintiff asserts that Merck failed to provide adequate warnings about potential side effects and risks associated with its medication, leading to her injuries. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Latiolais contends that Merck had a duty to adequately inform consumers about the risks of its product. She argues that the lack of proper warnings and the company’s conduct constitute negligence and breach of duty, leading to her medical complications. - **Defendant's Argument:** Merck & Co. defends itself by claiming that the warnings and instructions provided with the medication were sufficient and in accordance with industry standards. The company may also argue that the risks were well-documented and that Latiolais was informed of potential side effects. **Outcome:** [Provide a summary of the court's ruling, any settlements reached, or the verdict if available. This may include whether the plaintiff prevailed, if there was a dismissal, or if appeals are pending.] **Conclusion:** The Latiolais v. Merck & Co. case addresses important issues regarding pharmaceutical liability and the responsibilities of drug manufacturers to inform consumers about potential risks associated with their products. The outcome of the case may have implications for how pharmaceutical companies communicate safety information and handle adverse effects related to their medications. **Note:** For specific details regarding the ruling, evidence presented, and legal precedents cited, further research into legal databases and court records may be necessary.

Latiolais v. Merck & Co.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available