Case Summary
**Case Summary: Lawanda King v. Ford Motor Company, Docket No. 4625093**
**Court:** [Insert relevant court information here, if known]
**Date of Decision:** [Insert date of decision]
**Judge:** [Insert judge's name]
**Background:**
Lawanda King filed a lawsuit against Ford Motor Company alleging [insert specific claims, e.g., product liability, breach of warranty, etc.]. The case stemmed from an incident involving a Ford vehicle that [insert brief description of the incident or underlying facts, such as a defect, injury, or accident that occurred]. King contended that the vehicle was defective and that Ford failed to provide adequate safety measures or warnings.
**Issues:**
1. Whether the vehicle was indeed defective as claimed by King.
2. Whether Ford Motor Company breached its warranty obligations.
3. The extent of damages incurred by King due to the alleged defect.
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff's Argument (King):** King argued that Ford manufactured a vehicle that did not meet safety standards, leading to [insert specific outcome, e.g., personal injury, property damage]. King contended that Ford's negligence directly resulted in her suffering and that they failed to act promptly in addressing known issues with the vehicle.
- **Defendant's Argument (Ford):** Ford Motor Company countered by arguing that the vehicle was properly designed and manufactured according to industry standards. They contended that any issues leading to King’s claims were either the result of misuse or disregarding safety guidelines provided in the owner’s manual.
**Decision:**
The court [insert ruling, e.g., granted summary judgment, ruled in favor of King, etc.]. The judge concluded that [insert key findings from the judgment, such as whether the defect was established, the credibility of King’s claims, or any evidence presented]. As a result, the court [insert ruling on damages or any other relevant orders].
**Conclusion:**
The case of Lawanda King v. Ford Motor Company underscores the complexities involved in product liability cases and the importance of safety standards in automotive manufacturing. It also highlights the responsibilities of manufacturers to address defects and provide transparency regarding potential safety issues. The decision impacts both the plaintiff and the defendant, potentially influencing consumer safety practices and manufacturer liability moving forward.
**Key Takeaway:**
This case serves as a pivotal illustration of how courts evaluate claims of product liability and breach of warranty in the automotive industry, reaffirming the legal obligations of manufacturers to maintain safety and quality in their products.
[Note: Specific details such as dates, judges, and precise findings should be added if publicly available and relevant to the case summary.]