Legal Case Summary

Lawrence Thompson v. Pete Copeland


Date Argued: Thu Dec 07 2017
Case Number: 16-35301
Docket Number: 6238358
Judges:Hawkins, McKeown, Christen
Duration: 20 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Lawrence Thompson v. Pete Copeland** **Docket Number:** 6238358 **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., District Court, Appellate Court, etc.] **Date:** [Specify date of decision] **Background:** Lawrence Thompson initiated legal proceedings against Pete Copeland, alleging [briefly describe the nature of the dispute, e.g., breach of contract, negligence, etc.]. The case revolves around [provide relevant facts, including any events leading to the lawsuit, actions taken by each party, and any pertinent background information to understand the context of the case]. **Claims:** Thompson's claims against Copeland include [list the specific legal claims, e.g., damages for personal injury, compensation for lost wages, etc.]. He argues that [summarize the arguments made by Thompson regarding his claims]. **Defense:** Pete Copeland's defense consists of [summarize Copeland's response to the claims made by Thompson]. His main arguments include [outline the key points of defense, such as denial of liability, assertion of insufficient evidence, or other legal defenses]. **Court Findings:** The court examined the evidence presented by both parties, including [mention any crucial documents, testimonies, or expert opinions]. After reviewing the case, the court found that [summarize the court's findings, including any determinations regarding liability, fault, or damages]. **Ruling:** Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of [either Thompson or Copeland], concluding that [provide the court's decision, including any orders for compensation, specific actions to be taken, or dismissals of claims]. **Conclusion:** This case highlights [briefly reflect on the significance of the case, any legal principles established or reinforced, and potential implications for similar future cases]. The ruling serves as a precedent for [mention any broader applications or legal implications stemming from the case]. **Note:** For complete details and analysis, refer to the full court opinion and the docket file.

Lawrence Thompson v. Pete Copeland


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available