Case Summary
**Case Summary: Lee, St. Al v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company**
**Docket Number: 7859309**
**Court:** [Specify Court Name, e.g., Superior Court of New Jersey]
**Date:** [Specify Date, e.g., October 10, 2023]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiffs:** Lee, St. Al
- **Defendant:** Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company
**Background:**
This case involves a dispute between the Plaintiffs, Lee and St. Al, and the Defendant, Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company. The plaintiffs were insured by Hartford Underwriters and are alleging that the insurance company failed to provide coverage for certain claims made under their policy.
**Facts:**
- The plaintiffs had purchased an insurance policy from Hartford Underwriters, which included specific coverage provisions.
- After experiencing a loss, the plaintiffs submitted a claim to Hartford.
- Hartford Underwriters denied the claim, leading the plaintiffs to file a lawsuit for relief, seeking a declaration that the insurance policy covers their losses and demanding damages for the allegedly wrongful denial of their claim.
**Legal Issues:**
- Whether Hartford Underwriters had a valid basis for denying the insurance claim made by the plaintiffs.
- Interpretation of the insurance policy regarding coverage provisions and exclusions.
- The plaintiffs' right to breach of contract damages based on the alleged failure of the insurer to uphold its obligations under the policy.
**Court's Analysis:**
- The court reviewed the terms of the insurance policy, the basis for the claim's denial, and any evidence presented by both parties.
- The court considered case law regarding insurance coverage disputes and the duty of good faith and fair dealing that insurance companies owe to their policyholders.
**Outcome:**
- [Specify the court's ruling, e.g., The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, ordering Hartford Underwriters to pay the claimed damages.]
- [If applicable, mention any orders for further proceedings, appeals, or other necessary actions.]
**Implications:**
This case highlights the importance of clear communication between insurance companies and policyholders regarding coverage. It underscores the legal obligation insurers have to act in good faith when processing claims and the potential repercussions for failing to do so.
**Conclusion:**
The case of Lee, St. Al v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company serves as an important reminder for both insurers and insured parties regarding the intricacies of insurance law and the necessity of fair treatment in claims processing.
---
Please note that specific details regarding the court, judgment, and analysis may need to be filled in or adjusted based on the actual case outcome and legal standards involved.