Case Summary
**Case Summary**
**Case Title:** Lena L. Young, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Arthur Green, Jr. v. City of Tampa, Officer Anthony Portman, Tampa Police Department, Corporal Matthew Smith, Tampa Police Department
**Docket Number:** 7807231
**Court:** [Insert appropriate court name, e.g., U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida or another relevant court]
**Filing Date:** [Insert date of filing]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Lena L. Young, as the personal representative of the estate of Arthur Green, Jr.
- **Defendants:** City of Tampa; Officer Anthony Portman; Corporal Matthew Smith
**Background:**
The case arises from the events involving the late Arthur Green, Jr., who reportedly had interactions with the Tampa Police Department that led to his death. Lena L. Young, as the personal representative of his estate, filed a lawsuit against the City of Tampa and the officers involved, alleging wrongful death and constitutional violations resulting from the actions of the Tampa Police.
**Claims:**
The plaintiff asserts various claims against the defendants, including but not limited to:
1. Wrongful death due to alleged misconduct by the police officers.
2. Violation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983.
3. Negligence in the execution of their duties by the police officers.
**Facts:**
- Arthur Green, Jr. was engaged in circumstances that led to his encounter with the officers of the Tampa Police Department.
- Allegations include excessive force and improper conduct by Officer Anthony Portman and Corporal Matthew Smith.
- Significant injuries or fatality to Green resulted from this encounter, raising questions about police protocol and the use of force.
**Legal Proceedings:**
The case has gone through preliminary motions, including motions to dismiss, and has moved into discovery and possibly pre-trial preparations. Both sides have exchanged motions related to the evidence and the admissibility of witnesses.
**Current Status:**
As of the last update, the case may be in the midst of discovery or heading toward trial. The court's decision on pending motions will significantly impact the proceedings.
**Significance:**
This case highlights critical issues surrounding police conduct, accountability, and civil rights protections. It reflects ongoing national conversations about law enforcement practices and the legal ramifications of their actions.
**Next Steps:**
The court will consider the evidence presented by both parties, and a date for trial or further hearings will be established based on the court's schedule and rulings on motions.
**Conclusion:**
This case represents a pivotal moment for the plaintiff seeking justice for alleged wrongs against Arthur Green, Jr. while also scrutinizing the actions of law enforcement in the State of Florida.
**Note:** For further particulars regarding proceedings and legal arguments, please refer to the official court filings related to Docket Number 7807231.